Sentences with phrase «actual public climate»

Not exact matches

However, even if the hacked emails from HADCRU end up to be much ado about nothing in the context of any actual misfeasance that impacts the climate data records, the damage to the public credibility of climate research is likely to be significant.
Predictable and consistent behavior Prefers human company, especially children Relatively «directable» without training Affectionate Able to be banged around, by kids and clumsy humans Comfortable indoors, and in the climates you live in and take vacations Doesn't require a lot of exercise Calm in the home; not hyperactive Medium high food drive; medium high prey drive (for fetching) Able to take, and learn from, a correction Low initiative Low fearfulness Submissive Low other - dog aggression Quiet; not highly reactive to bark at sights and sounds around the home or in public Image of a guard dog without the actual follow through (if you are into that kind of thing) Easily Housetrained (some breeds are easier than others)
The public relations efforts of developed nations on climate change are always more effective than ours, but it is more important to look at their actual actions.
Much has been made this week of the gap between what the public thinks about the consensus among climate scientists over the human factor in global warming and the actual level of consensus.
Although the mainstream press is not the least interested in the actual scientific merits of any climate issue, they are certainly quick to push on the public the unsubstantiated disaster hyperbole that is fabricated by needy climate scientists.
But there remains a gap — independent of politics — between how much the public thinks scientists agree on the fundamentals of climate change and what the actual level of agreement is.
Purposes of the messages will be to challenge the alarmist position on atmospheric warming, educate the public on actual climate behaviour and force supporters the likes of Al Gore into an open debate.
NB: I would also want the actual forecast changes by 2100 to be incuded in every public climate change statement, so the public can see how catastrophioc they middle range predictionsare, versus other global problems, or spending the money on defences rather than subsidising what makes things worse by law, etc..
But the gap between public warnings and actual events produced an endless stream of climate irony.
The vast majority of the public knows a lot less about climate sensitivity, the link between hurricanes and CO2 or analogues with past climates than either you or I do, but the link between these issues and actual policy is quite convoluted.
Particularly, repeated exposure to simple messages that correctly state the actual scientific consensus on human - caused climate change is a strategy likely to help counter the concerted efforts to misinform the public.
Third, the fact that Suzuki does not have even possess a sliver of actual, real world climate science reveals a complete utter contempt for the public and taxpayers.
«Why We Need More CO2 Emissions, Not Less How the Climate Alarmists Attempt to Mislead the Public and Dupe the Gullible: An Actual Example»
Daubert challenges... will hopefully focus the courtroom debate on the actual scientific issues of climate change, as opposed to the smoke - and - mirrors evidence and conclusions that have so often prevailed in the public debate.
Despite the embarrassment of the Climategate data fraud and conspiracy scandal, it has not stopped the politically motivated and financially hungry at Copenhagen from making every effort to lie and mislead the public about the actual global climate condition.
Presenting such alternative figures confuses and undermines the public understanding of the actual science, which is an understanding about the driving mechanisms of sea level rise: thermal expansion of ocean water, melting of mountain glaciers and complex dynamics of large ice sheets — in correspondence again with projected temperature rise, that is in turn a product of projected rises of greenhouse gas concentrations using calculated estimates of climate sensitivity, together creating a net disturbance in Earth's energy balance, the very root cause of anthropogenic climate change.
Of course if the actual recorded at the time temperature data was released as a full data base with official blessing it would probably only be a matter of quite as short time before it would be decided by the climate interested public and politicals that all that morphed out of reality, adjusted data those scientists were playing with on their play stations wasn't really needed as it bore no resemblance to reality nor had any sort of any perceptible impact or effect on society and their funding should and would consequently cease.
As the Environmental Protection Agency nears a final ruling that manmade global warming endangers the public health and welfare, «the chamber will tell the EPA in a filing today that a trial - style public hearing» on the science of climate change is needed to «make a fully informed, transparent decision with scientific integrity based on the actual record of the science.»
As the public has become weary of all wild predictions of catastrophe due to global warming and climate change, another speculative claim falls victim to actual data and peer - reviewed research.
I can't comment for public's actual perception of the range of forcings affecting climate.
He thinks Climate Gate was an actual scandal: «These e-mails from leading climatologists make clear efforts to use statistical tricks to distort their findings and intentionally mislead the public on the issue of climate change.Climate Gate was an actual scandal: «These e-mails from leading climatologists make clear efforts to use statistical tricks to distort their findings and intentionally mislead the public on the issue of climate change.climate change.»
Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented: Executive Summary: This paper illuminates a bias introduced in the public debate on climate change, and I [JC] suspect that this bias feeds back into biasing the actual scientific research of many of those scientists most active in interacting with theClimate Collections and commented: Executive Summary: This paper illuminates a bias introduced in the public debate on climate change, and I [JC] suspect that this bias feeds back into biasing the actual scientific research of many of those scientists most active in interacting with theclimate change, and I [JC] suspect that this bias feeds back into biasing the actual scientific research of many of those scientists most active in interacting with the media.
This paper illuminates a bias introduced in the public debate on climate change, and I suspect that this bias feeds back into biasing the actual scientific research of many of those scientists most active in interacting with the media.
There continues to be a huge gap between public perception of consensus and the actual 97 % consensus among climate scientists (although new data indicates the consensus gap is closing).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z