Not only does it completely discount
the actual public reasons why we fund a universal K - 12 system — such as citizenship — but also it has never and can never deliver the equality of choices that DeVos and education reformers keep promising.
Not exact matches
But precisely for this
reason all Christians do not only receive a complete and supposedly concrete natural law which is communicated to them by the official representatives of the Church, they also find out for them - selves the
actual requirements of
public life, so that all may have as much freedom as possible, a freedom that can act with God in view and thus create that personal finality which receives God himself as its eternal meaning.
This is an answer about the
actual reasons behind these campaigns rather than the
public excuses used to justify them.
As a result of this failure to «predict» the result, the Market Research Society held an inquiry into the
reasons why the polls had been so much at variance with
actual public opinion.
Indeed, one of the
reasons why so many voters feel betrayed by Nick Clegg is that, even on the
actual result this year, it could be argued that the true consensus was to cut
public spending more slowly.
If so, there is
reason to believe the race for state school chief will once again prove critical to CTA and charter supporters even though the Superintendent of
Public Instruction has little
actual authority over education policy in the state.
His
reasoning is that the free educational choices of parents alone are insufficient to ensure that choice - based reforms benefit the
public by generating
actual improvements in student learning.
[119] For competitive
reasons, Amazon does not release
actual sales figures to the
public.
-
Actual public float is only $ 40mn (on market cap of ~ 400mn) with the rest essentially owned by institutions that won't be selling in the near future meaning lack of liquidity could be a
reason for a discount
However, even for slander per se, there is the question of whether Spencer and Christy are «
public figures,» in which case they would have to show «
actual malice» to actually prevail in a defamation law suit, meaning the comment was false, and Trenberth et al. knew or had
reason to know it was false.
He continued: «Our Director also set out the criteria he would take into account when deciding which cases we should accept for investigation: the impact of the case on UK financial plc in general and the City of London in particular; the scale of losses,
actual or potential; the extent of the gain,
actual or potential; whether we were dealing with a new kind of fraud or whether there was some other
public interest
reason for taking the case on.
While Canadian courts have repeatedly expressed reluctance to embrace Sullivan - style changes regarding
actual malice, 175 three matters must be stressed: first, this proposal is markedly different from Sullivan and does not conflict with the
reasons for which the SCC disparaged Sullivan; second, the
public figure concept itself predates the Sullivan decision as a defence applicable in infringement of privacy cases and so can be relied on without being dragged into the vortex of debate over the advisability of Sullivan and its progeny; and third, Canadian defamation law already recognizes that certain plaintiffs require different treatment vis - à - vis the remedies available to them, 176 which can be construed as a latent foundation for acceptance of the
public figure concept.
The
public figure concept was entrenched in US defa - mation law in the concurring
reasons in the Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts177 decision, which expanded the reach of the Sullivan
actual malice requirement beyond
public officials.
According to Moore Blatch, there are a number of
reasons why the take up of LPAs remains low in the general
public, including: a general lack of awareness of LPAs, a lack of willingness to accept that one might need an LPA, and the perceived and
actual complexity of putting one in place.
But, while the
actual practice of law may become more complex and demanding — thanks to
public scrutiny and technological changes — the importance of the legal profession will only continue to grow for those same
reasons.
Even if we could do so with accurate predictions and with
actual authority, there is
reason to question whether the
public interest is pursued in limiting numbers in response to economic anxiety within the profession.
i was made to feel like some kind of sleazy commissioned salesman trying to put something over on the
public, when in reality, all that I was doing was giving the readers an
actual reason to call me to verify my truthful claim.