Not exact matches
Please cite
actual «
scientific» facts that do more than *
point * to god's existence.
It also
pointed out that FSANZ carries no
actual safety evaluation and its safety assumption were biased on data provided by IRRI and corporate proponents while ignoring crucial
scientific data on the perils of GMOs to human health.
Magister Negi Magi, who
points out in vain that «manga doesn't involve
actual children so there are no
actual victims» and that «there's no
scientific evidence» that manga and anime actually cause people to commit crimes.
Main Gallery: Simple Experiments in Aerodynamics: 6 & 7 George Bures Miller «s Simple Experiments in Aerodynamicsseries are less propositions for
actual scientific experiments and more
points of departure, preparatory works that represent and inform the sentiments of surprise, daring and crisis that accompany the experimental and subsequent experiential process.
I
pointed out that you seem focused on a source of funding for messages vs. the
scientific quality of the
actual message.
I do see a
point in trend lines rather than
actual UAH measurements, but then, Tom, if you want to compare the historic proxies with a trend line UAH, you should be
scientific and consequent.
I'm no fan of Mr. Mann's approach to the law or
scientific transparency, but the song in your junkscience article link seems to miss the major
point: «hide the decline» is about a decline in hypothetical - temperatures predicted by proxy data (tree rings), not about the
actual temperature record.
If you want to actually discuss something
scientific please go ahead and deal with an
actual point from the article.
Which brings me to the
point that surely you can agree with Jennifer on: In general the public debate should involve a lot more looking at the
actual data (cf. business & economics reporting) than the «meta - debate» we so often see currently, and specifically that «ultimately, good policy is going to require that a much larger percentage of Australians have a higher level of
scientific literacy.»
While the article published last month was an
actual scientific study, in which «non-groomers» were compared to «groomers,» it was still just a starting
point, with several weaknesses that future research must overcome.