All the changes in
the actual teaching of the Faith since the 1960s were accompanied by changes in English society and in education itself.
Not exact matches
The word which got translated into Latin as «credo» did not really mean «I believe this as
actual fact» but something more like «I put my
faith in, or I commit myself to, or I follow the
teaching of...».
So if you go by Christ's
actual teachings, Obama is a much better Christian than most
of the Christians who are questioning his
faith right now.
Acknowledged, it is all the result
of ignorance and a
faith that is socially conditioned to hold an unwavering
faith in the corruption
of his
actual teaching from a position
of ignorance in the Truth
of what he was actually
teaching and why he was
teaching it.
We must continue to be clear in explaining the
actual teaching of the Church, so as to promote a true synthesis
of science and Christian
faith.
Although the moral standards and ethical judgments
of this country have long been permeated by Christian
teaching, there is a widespread ignorance both
of the
actual history
of the Christian
Faith and
of its revolutionary character.
In the fourth century Athanasius sums up this process in these words: «The
actual original tradition,
teaching, and
faith of the Catholic church, which the Lord conferred, the apostles proclaimed, and the Fathers guarded» (Ad Seraph.
In «every case that I have read or heard,» he continued «none
of these people have referred to the
actual teaching of Jesus on marriage,» which was «surely the foundation
of any theological or
faith - shaped response to this referendum.»
Statistically, if there even is a god, it is far more likely that one
of faith has chosen (or been
taught without the benefit
of making an
actual personal choice) the wrong god to believe in or the wrong set
of tenets ascribed to that particular god or that the one true religion has either gone extinct or hasn't been formulated yet.