«I don't believe they got into changing
actual voting outcomes,» Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in interview with USA TODAY's Susan Page.
Not exact matches
Amazingly, some extraordinarily courageous individuals (initially Arnold himself, journalists David Quinn and Breda O'Brien, the Iona Institute; later on, John Waters, retired Regius Professor of Laws at Trinity College Dublin, William Binchy and the distinguished historian Prof. John A. Murphy; the gay campaigners for a «No»
vote, Paddy Manning and Keith Mills, deserve special mention) did succeed in making a difference to the eventual numbers, although not the
outcome: in the early Spring, polls indicated that 17 percent of the electorate would
vote against the amendment, but by the time the
actual referendum came around, 38 percent were indicating a «No»
vote, and that was the eventual
outcome.
From these we took an average (median)
outcome for each party, and applied a small correction for the greater
votes dispersal across smaller parties in
actual EP
votes compared to opinion polls.
He said: «Election Management Bodies in our sub-regions and beyond have deployed technology in one way or another to improve on the processes, administration and
outcome of elections, ranging from training and capacity - building for electoral officials, promotion of inclusivity in the electoral process (youths, women, PWDs, IDPs and out - of - country / diaspora voters), the biometric registration of voters, delineation of electoral constituencies, geo - referencing of existing as well as the creation of new polling units, establishment of robust electronic databases, accreditation of voters during elections,
actual voting and the speedy and more accurate collation / transmission of results.
«Although they didn't change
actual votes or alter the
outcome, their efforts were an attack on our democracy.