No word as to whether Fido was
an actual witness in the case.
Not exact matches
It stated that although there was an 82 per cent increase
in reported fraud
cases as compared to 2015; the banking sector
witnessed marginal reduction
in the value of attempted frauds and
actual losses.
Grand jury proceedings are closed to the public and somewhat biased toward making a
case, but it won't be any easier for the
witnesses to face opposing counsel
in the
actual public trial.
The book covers the essential skills a lawyer needs to be effective as a cross-examiner and then illustrates those lessons with annotated transcripts from
actual trials, including Bailey's cross of the coroner
in the Sam Sheppard
case and Roy Black's examination of the key
witness in the William Kennedy Smith trial.
Bearing
in mind these points, I would say that the way
in which technology advancement has impacted the work I do, including
in expert
witness cases, is that the
actual person or company responsible for the root cause of the failure may now be somewhere down a relatively convoluted supply chain, and the opportunity for substandard or counterfeit components to be incorporated into a manufacturers product has increased — something that is of particular concern to military and aerospace suppliers.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except
in cases arising
in the land or naval forces, or
in the Militia, when
in actual service
in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put
in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled
in any criminal
case to be a
witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
With VR being the instrument of expert
witness in this
case, how do you think we might see a proliferation
in the use of VR as opposed to
actual motoring expert
witnesses, or other specialists,
in courtrooms to follow?
A products liability
case may bring the
actual defective product into court to show the judge or jury that the product did
in fact break
in the way that
witnesses say it did.
(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after prosecution and defence
case closed; use of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a prosecution
witness; whether BSB has power to summons
witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of
actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB prosecutions department
in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except
in cases arising
in the land or naval forces, or
in the Militia, when
in actual service
in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put
in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled
in any criminal
case to be a
witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Bearing
in mind these points, I would say that theway inwhich technology advancement has impacted the work I do, including
in expert
witness cases, is that the
actual person or company responsible for the root cause of the failure may now be somewhere down a relatively convoluted supply chain, and the opportunity for substandard or counterfeit components to be incorporated into a manufacturers product has increased — something that is of particular concern to military and aerospace suppliers.
Jury nullification
in the broader sense can cause
cases to be thrown out by a judge or on appeal for reasons # 4 or # 5, but most of the time, jury nullification will not cause a verdict to be thrown out by a judge or on appeal (even if statements from jurors after the trial make it clear that jury nullification
in the broader sense actually took place), if a jury that weighed the evidence and evaluated the credibility of the
witnesses differently than the
actual jury did could have reached the same verdict.