Sentences with phrase «actually agreed to a contract»

Not exact matches

Actually, several months passed before the contract was formalized and we left for T&T, enough time for Mary Jane to agree to be a co-author and to buy some «Punch M - 3» capsaicin spray (she never had to use it).

James» team negotiated that into his contract to give him some freedom of movement, and the Cavaliers agreed because they couldn't conceive of James or another team actually forking over that much cash to leave Northeast Ohio.

At the same time as most Arsenal fans are now thoroughly fed up and most agree that the club were wrong to hand Arsene Wenger a new contract at the end of last season, with the fans who actually think the Frenchman is still the best man for the job dwindling by the day, I do not think that our long serving manager should take all the blame for the sorry state that Arsenal find ourselves in.

I agree that Ozil was a great signing (Although he didn't exactly rush to renew his contract recently) but I reckon you will struggle to come - up with many more examples that actually signed to «Play for Wenger» when they were already established players KEN1945

It wasn't just a struggle getting players in; we also had problems getting existing players to sign new deals and the whole summer was a will they or won't they story as to whether Roger Eli, John Francis and John Pender would actually agree to new contracts with Burnley.

But the situation is even worse that first thought for Old Trafford accountants — as the unearthed contract between the sides shows that they actually agreed to stump up a mega # 26.5 million.

Actually, when Michael Eisner was CEO of the Walt Disney Company, and the contract previously agreed upon between Pixar and Disney was coming to an end, the two companies developed quite the contentious relationship.

There is an entire sub-industry selling books and seminars to authors, to show them how to get a contract with an agent, and how to get a publisher to actually agree to publish their book.

When the option to sign a new contract first pops up you naturally assume that you're agreeing to ride for that team next season, and the game says nothing to make you think otherwise, something which will undoubtedly surprise more than a few people because what actually happens when you sign with a team in the next class up is that you're transferred to that team instantly.

So we were in a really tight spot at that time, and agreed to the terms of this new contract,» However the contract stipulated that neither company was financially obligated to the other, and that Yogscast did not actually have to hire a new programmer, despite Kris Vales «understanding» that they would.

Having seen language in digital contract signing that basically say that you have to agree to use an e-signature as a signature, I feel like there's a bit of a problem in that needing to agree to use an e-signature suffers the same problem as needing to agree to use an e-signature, in that you sort of should, if you have to agree to digital signing, have an ever - backwards - stretching line of agreements that need to be agreed to... but this is obviously not how it works in practice, so how is it actually working?

Imagine a situation where one party shakes hands with the intention of actually hiring the other person, while the other person thinks the handshake is just an agreement to send the actual contract for review and possible acceptance - these people didn't agree on the same thing, so the contract is invalid.

I find it rather hard to believe you can actually disclaim liability with a notice buried in part of the book which no one reads (unlike contract law, the reader never explicitly «agrees» to this disclaimer), but it probably doesn't hurt.

This decision of the Court of Appeal confirms that employers should beware when drafting contracts as on numerous occasions, the ET has looked behind the contract to ascertain exactly what the person carrying out the work is actually doing and if in reality the requirement is for personal service, if the company exerts control over the person, if the person receives pay slips even though they submit invoices and have signed an agreement which imposes restrictive covenants, then even ifthe person carrying out the work has agreed to label of «self - employed», submits VAT returns, is taxed as self - employed and claims tax advantages it is likely that the ET will find that the person is a worker and will be entitled to holiday pay and various other advantages not enjoyed by the self employed.

the above comment does not establish a rule that if contracting parties would have agreed to a term (had it been suggested to them), then that term may be implied; the parties must have actually intended for that term to be included;

Of course - if you have records, witnesses, etc. that can attest to what you actually agreed to, you can use that as evidence that the other party is playing funny with your contract.

I'm trying to make the argument that agreeing to a contract with a company sponsored training program is actually beneficial to the advancement of your trucking career.

It's unbelievable, if I'm reading you correctly, that the wholesaler wanted you to agree to purchase a contract (which is what an assignment of contract is) without actually producing the contract.