Like I said in my first response, when you have something actually interesting, relevant and evidence to
actually back up your claim, then we'll talk.
Actually back up your claims, or else have the guts to retract them if you can not support them.
Please use your humongous brain that you apparently possess and try again and
actually back up claims instead of just making it.
While everyone claims to have the best sleep supplement on the market, we believe we can
actually back up this claim with real science and real numbers.
There have been no substantial reports prior to today that could
actually back up the claim that the iPhone 7 Plus will have support for the Apple Pencil.
Not exact matches
Truth is,
claims about how minimum wages
actually affect the poor are hard to
back up with data.
@fimeilleur
actually i can
back up the
claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
And not one jot of evidence
backs up the
claims that any one of these gods
actually existed.
If you consider all those other gods to be mythical creatures that never
actually existed, but you
claim that your God was different, then it's
up to you to
back up that
claim and, so far, you have done rather poorly.
Instead of using the bible to
back up your
claims, prove that the bible is
actually true to begin with.
Dawkins
claims that what
actually occurs in natural evolution is incremental change, analogous to a more cautious climber's slow ascent
up along, but gentle, slope around the
back of that steep cliff.
I know that concern has been expressed by some that these devices have not been validated in peer - reviewed studies, and, as readers of MomsTEAM and my blog know, products which
claim to
actually prevent concussions or risk the severity of concussion symptoms without their
claims being
backed up by peer - reviewed studies ordinarily don't pass muster with me.
I've had that happen any number of times, I made a
claim about something I «knew,» someone challenged me, I looked for a source to
back up my point and discovered I was
actually wrong, or at least much less right than I thought.
@AcePL Try
actually finding out how to
back up your
claims, rather than just constantly spitting out your preexisting misinformed opinion.
When there is no appropriate subsection, then the link might not
actually be relevant to
back up the
claims in your answer.
Don't get me wrong though; there are still a select variety of quality supplements out there that
actually have some decent research to
back up their
claims.
While everyone
claims to have the best pre-workout supplement on the market, I can
actually back up such
claim with real science, and real numbers.
While everyone
claims to have the best pre-workout supplement on the market, we can
actually back it
up with real science and real numbers.
Asus is making bold
claims, but it may
actually be in a position to
back them
up in the coming months.
If you also use an online discount broker, you can make an RRSP contribution easily online, just by transferring funds into your RRSP account: that should generate the needed RRSP receipt that you will use to
back up your
claim: you still have two months for that receipt to arrive and to finish inputting other data into your return — T5s, T3s and the like can be expected to dribble in until the end of March and first week of April, which is why I always hold off
actually filing (via NETFILE) until the second week of April.
While both Metal Gear Solid 2 and 5 made the same
claims to validate the existence of their unconventional protagonists, the former, unlike the latter, was
actually able to
back that
up by being true to those
claims, all the way from start to finish.
I wasn't aggressive, I wasn't a fanboy, and I
actually used factual arguments to
back up my
claims, so why the disagree, unfortunately, I may not answer, as I can only post once more after to this, but I will read it, so come on, tell me what you disagreed with in my post.
However, no other proof exists to
back up the
claim (further confused by the fact that ESRB raters don't
actually play the games they evaluate), and Nintendo stamped the leaks out too quickly for any further information to emerge.
I apologize for asking for actual evidence to justify a
claim... but you know, I am a «skeptic» in the true sense of the word and
actually like to see a
claim backed up by evidence.
Have you read what some of the people around here have said about scientists like Jim Hansen, Michael Mann, Gavin Schmidt, and others?!? I hardly think that my noting a particular recent instance regarding one of Lindzen's recent scientific
claims and suggesting that one might want to
actually have evidence to
back up the
claim constitutes «abuse» or «smear» or «holler [ing]».
Since you
claim to debunk the «Greenland Myth» I'd suggest you cite sources that
actually back up your «science.»
Before anyone mentions the glaciers and the 2035 date, I'll point out the generally overlooked points: 1) The original source
actually stated 2350; 2) The Indian government website stated 2035; 3) From there it went viral as 2035, it seems; 4) When it eventually wound
up in the IPCC report, at least one editor objected to it in Draft 2 — Deltoid aka Tim Lambert has the details on his blogsite; 5) The IPCC editors violated their own rules on citation in that they did not trace the
claim of 2035
back to the original, peer reviewed, source.
One drawback is that while you can send
back -
up information to the company's
claims department through your mobile device, you can not
actually turn in your
claim with the app.
If you end
up getting
back to work before you
actually begin to collect benefits, you can always cancel the
claim.