Sentences with phrase «actually believe in climate change»

Image copyright Getty Images Good news for environmental campaigners: President - elect Trump has finally nominated someone to his cabinet who actually believes in climate change science.

The president didn't tackle climate change head - on in the speech, though Bill Clinton introduced him as «someone who actually believes in climate change» — to which Obama grinned and gave a thumbs up.

Not exact matches

After years of inaction by the old Progressive Conservative government, it is refreshing to have a government that believes in climate change and has actually presented a policy to address it.

Actually global heating (climate change) will make the point of whether these fantasy gods are whatever stupid people believe them to be a moot point in a few years as humans and all living things do a slow roast as temperatures climb higher and remain there for hundreds of years....

The vast majority of the commenters were critical not of Lomborg's dismissal of the urgency of climate action but rather that anyone, including Lomborg, would actually believe in any human - induced climate change.

«But actually, in fact, it takes considerable mental dexterity not to get messed up on which «climate change» one's farmer constituents don't believe in and which they do.»

But actually, it takes considerable mental dexterity not to get messed up on which «climate change» one's farmer constituents don't believe in and which they do.

Bast and Spencer are motivated to debunk the 97 percent «myth» because they have a vested interest, via their affiliation with Heartland, in getting the public to believe that the scientists are a lot less certain about the reality of man - made climate change than they actually are.

We are proud to provide a forum for the thousands of scientists and policy experts who actually understand climate change — how complex it is, how much we don't know, and the difference between scientific knowledge and scientific forecasting — and don't just «believe» it in.

As Weitzman himself clearly recognizes, in order for him to distinguish climate change dangers from other dangers in this matter, he must therefore show not only that it is possible that the true probability distribution of potential levels of warming is actually much worse than believed by the IPCC, but that a reasonable observer should accept it as likely that this is the case.

Researchers also believe that melting icebergs are actually helping to slow down the effects of climate change since it improves the nutrients in water and promotes plankton blooms.

You wouldn't know it from reading the published papers, but the experiments actually didn't find that the «message» changed the proportion of subjects who said they «believe in» human caused climate change...)

As I see it if anyone is actually crazy enough to actually believe that then a few «alarmist» headlines aren't to blame, nor would it make any difference if the media started reporting climate change in a more «moderate» way — this kind of attitude comes from a deep rooted idealogical opposition to government action and environmentalism.

I would expect to see about one degree C of man - made warming between now and 2100, and believe most of the cries that «we are already seeing catastrophic climate changes» are in fact panics driven by normal natural variation (most supposed trends, say in hurricanes or tornadoes or heat waves, can't actually be found when one looks at the official data).

You know, I would have a lot less trouble believing climate scientists could actually measure changes in global average sea level to within a milimeter, if I didn't know how badly they overstate their confidence in «global average temperature» in all its many manifestations, with all its many assumptions, models and WAGs.