The president didn't tackle climate change head - on in the speech, though Bill Clinton introduced him as «someone who
actually believes in climate change» — to which Obama grinned and gave a thumbs up.
Image copyright Getty Images Good news for environmental campaigners: President - elect Trump has finally nominated someone to his cabinet who
actually believes in climate change science.
Not exact matches
After years of inaction by the old Progressive Conservative government, it is refreshing to have a government that
believes in climate change and has
actually presented a policy to address it.
Actually global heating (
climate change) will make the point of whether these fantasy gods are whatever stupid people
believe them to be a moot point
in a few years as humans and all living things do a slow roast as temperatures climb higher and remain there for hundreds of years....
The vast majority of the commenters were critical not of Lomborg's dismissal of the urgency of
climate action but rather that anyone, including Lomborg, would
actually believe in any human - induced
climate change.
«But
actually,
in fact, it takes considerable mental dexterity not to get messed up on which «
climate change» one's farmer constituents don't
believe in and which they do.»
But
actually, it takes considerable mental dexterity not to get messed up on which «
climate change» one's farmer constituents don't
believe in and which they do.
Bast and Spencer are motivated to debunk the 97 percent «myth» because they have a vested interest, via their affiliation with Heartland,
in getting the public to
believe that the scientists are a lot less certain about the reality of man - made
climate change than they
actually are.
We are proud to provide a forum for the thousands of scientists and policy experts who
actually understand
climate change — how complex it is, how much we don't know, and the difference between scientific knowledge and scientific forecasting — and don't just «
believe» it
in.
As Weitzman himself clearly recognizes,
in order for him to distinguish
climate change dangers from other dangers
in this matter, he must therefore show not only that it is possible that the true probability distribution of potential levels of warming is
actually much worse than
believed by the IPCC, but that a reasonable observer should accept it as likely that this is the case.
Researchers also
believe that melting icebergs are
actually helping to slow down the effects of
climate change since it improves the nutrients
in water and promotes plankton blooms.
You wouldn't know it from reading the published papers, but the experiments
actually didn't find that the «message»
changed the proportion of subjects who said they «
believe in» human caused
climate change...)
As I see it if anyone is
actually crazy enough to
actually believe that then a few «alarmist» headlines aren't to blame, nor would it make any difference if the media started reporting
climate change in a more «moderate» way — this kind of attitude comes from a deep rooted idealogical opposition to government action and environmentalism.
I would expect to see about one degree C of man - made warming between now and 2100, and
believe most of the cries that «we are already seeing catastrophic
climate changes» are
in fact panics driven by normal natural variation (most supposed trends, say
in hurricanes or tornadoes or heat waves, can't
actually be found when one looks at the official data).
You know, I would have a lot less trouble
believing climate scientists could
actually measure
changes in global average sea level to within a milimeter, if I didn't know how badly they overstate their confidence
in «global average temperature»
in all its many manifestations, with all its many assumptions, models and WAGs.