Sentences with phrase «actually calculate the value»

Not exact matches

I don't mind it for normal recipes and actually when I first posted this shake I used the higher recipe builder p + values, but I wasn't sure how people calculated smoothies so I asked on the message boards and every response I got said they calculate the ingredients separately so I changed it.

Hi Linda, as I mentioned in my comment to Mary - Maureen, I actually don't calculate the nutrition values for my recipes.

Ultimately, the outcome of this neural computing operation is a probability value — the computer calculates, for example, how likely it is that a face actually does correspond to that of the person being sought.

We all fantasize about a world in which student learning growth on math and reading tests is calculated and used by central authorities to judge quality, but the reality is that very few school systems actually rely heavily on value - added measures (VAM).

This can occur, regardless of what is actually happening in terms of actual effectiveness across America's classrooms, when the purported value that teachers add to or detract from student learning (i.e., 50 % of the state's model) is to substantively count, because VAM output is not calculated in absolute terms, but rather in relative or normative terms.

And we have watched how the Tennessee Board of Education and other leaders in the state have met, attempted to rescind, and actually rescinded some of the policy requirements that tie teachers» to their VAM scores, again as determined by teachers» students» performance as calculated by the familiar Tennessee Education Value - Added Assessment System (TVAAS), and its all - too - familiar mother - ship, the Education Value - Added Assessment System (EVAAS).

The margin of safety for a company for which intrinsic value can actually be calculated (i.e. not in the «too hard» pile) should be so big that a really smart person can do the valuation in their head.

I actually calculate TFG's intrinsic value is currently within 3 % of its NAV, so I won't bore you with the math right now.

Essentially, equity tells you how much of the car you actually own, and you can calculate your car's equity with minor math by subtracting the total amount you still owe to the financial institution or dealership from the actual value of the car.

All good reasons to ignore them, go straight to the source and actually calculate net asset value based directly on reserves.

One last thing we'll calculate is the value of actually spending the $ 25,000 to get the 10,000 - mile bonus from the card.

That may be true if you're actually using your MR points that way, though it also assumes that you agree with me when I said that «Yes, You DID Get 10 Cents Per Mile For Your Award Redemption» in calculating the value of premium award redemptions.

One last thing we'll calculate is the value of actually spending the $ 25,000 to get the 10,000 - mile bonus from the card.

If you calculate the value, you're actually getting over 2 cents per point / mile, so normally I would consider that a pretty good use of points.

But because the points are calculated on the base fare, you can actually get anywhere from 1.5 to 1.9 cents per point value.

Actually, though, most of the OLR originates from below the tropopause (can get up around 18 km in the tropics, generally lower)-- with a majority of solar radiation absorbed at the surface, a crude approximation can be made that the area emitting to space is less than 2 * (20/6371) * 100 % ~ = 0.628 % more than the area heated by the sun, so the OLR per unit area should be well within about 0.6 % of the value calculated without the Earth's curvature (I'm guessing it would actually be closer to if not less than 0.3 % difActually, though, most of the OLR originates from below the tropopause (can get up around 18 km in the tropics, generally lower)-- with a majority of solar radiation absorbed at the surface, a crude approximation can be made that the area emitting to space is less than 2 * (20/6371) * 100 % ~ = 0.628 % more than the area heated by the sun, so the OLR per unit area should be well within about 0.6 % of the value calculated without the Earth's curvature (I'm guessing it would actually be closer to if not less than 0.3 % difactually be closer to if not less than 0.3 % different).

Since the values given are stated to be «mean and 95 % confidence intervals», I can not see any justification for the efficacy uncertainty ranges actually being 95 % confidence intervals for a single run, centered on the mean efficacy calculated over all runs.

The economist's role is not to establish how much people should value items gained or lost, but to calculate based on observing how much these people actually value these items.

However, while that does raise a big question mark over your application of the relationship to calculate transient temperature values, it actually suggests to me that he did an even better job than you may think.

So if we actually calculate the psi - values for junctions in a passive house they're typically negative values, in order to correct for our conservative over-estimation when doing our energy - accountancy.

In case of a continuous distribution of possible empirical values the probability is calculated for a narrow range of values close to the one actually observed.

Our knowledge base, however, is insufficient to quantify the effects of climate change on many of these metrics because of conceptual challenges posed by climate change to standard assumptions, as well as practical data and methodological hurdles; insufficient understanding of how such metrics capture the way people actually feel; and, for non-monetized values, sometimes resistance to calculating them at all (Sussman et al 2014, Neumann and Strzepek 2014).

If we get to this point, we then have to ask if the system currently used to calculate global surface temperatures actually tells us anything of value about the heat energy at the surface.

I actually calculated everything without software last time, so I don't have the software to input it, but I am guessing that to make the change from 25 to 50 % I can add another form 4562 this year to state that there is an in - service date of 1/2015, with value of 25 %.

This metric actually measures the net operating income (NOI) that is produced by the property as percent of its market value and is calculated as: