Sentences with phrase «actually changing the legislation»
In short, the President Isn't actually changing the legislation.
https://politics.stackexchange.com/ Not exact matches
Proposed changes to the legislation introduced on Monday may actually lead to even more widespread coverage losses.
Actually Saraswati, you abandoned your original position that America is a «two party system which only legislation is likely to change» and supported everything I said, which is that legislation is not required, and the number of parties is not designed into the system, and it's not likely to happen because people here prefer to abandon their true beliefs in favor of a lesser evil that might win.
«Actually Saraswati, you abandoned your original position that America is a «two party system which only legislation is likely to change» and supported everything I said...»
So where I disagree with Larison is his claim that «Conservatives actually know very well that they do not speak for a majority in this country, and they are also well aware that changes that would allow for more direct, plebiscitary democracy, whether in presidential elections or in passing legislation, would work to the detriment of their smaller states and their overall political interests.»
«I'm actually a big fan of sun setting more legislation than not simply because as circumstances change it gives you an opportunity to make adjustments and amendments as time goes on,» Majority Leader Joe Morelle said.
What's the legislation that you have brought through that is actually making a change?»
She said, «people are drafting legislation and guidelines that will actually change the experience for actresses auditioning and rehearsing, and that's huge».
I am not clear on how long ago this actually took place, however in 2015, the pension legislation in Canada was changed.
They actually have to pass legislation to change it, and any retroactive changes will likely fail (both to pass, and if it does pass, will likely die in court).
Some well - intended legislation has actually made it more difficult and more expensive to care for our homeless animals and to provide services for our community pets.More changes are certainly on the horizon, but I want to thank all of you who have been a part of supporting our organization and our animals through the years.
I really hope the Keystone XL pipeline is not approved, but as Friedman says, with the right kind of grassroots reaction, perhaps enough political pressure can be placed on the President and members of Congress to actually get some significant legislation passed to slow climate change.
The legislation, HB 819, actually represented a compromise over a previous draft of the law, which mandated consideration of a possible 8 - inch sea level rise, based solely upon historical patterns rather than climate change models.
After the Waxman - Markey climate bill historically passed the US House of Reps, many saw their hopes renewed that legislation, however flawed, could actually be passed to combat climate change.
Until landowners are prevented from signing away their land for a generation or more without a requirement they receive independent legal advice, until the legislation and regulation is made transparent to average voters (for example, until they understand why much of what they actually want to appeal may not be appealed so that, from their perspective, they in fact have no right of appeal), until they understand why of all structures it is only the power to approve the erection of wind towers that has been taken away from local municipalities, until they understand why applications for immediately adjacent areas (by gilead and wpd) abutting Lake Ontario in either the most dense or second-most dense bird migration area in all of Eastern Canada may not be joined into one proceeding [guess whose interests that favours]... the list of «untils» is a long one and there is no indication of any change on the way.
In all seriousness — this sounds like the sort of legislation that is intended to placate some small group of people who really care about this sort of thing while not actually changing anything.
While CREA's Code continues to get watered down to the lowest common denominator, RECOs Code has not changed and if RECO ever decided could be actually increased under the new legislation being enacted...... so
NREI: What power would President Trump, Secretary of the Treasury Mnuchin or various agencies actually have to make changes, or would this require new legislation?