Judges have
actually convicted people who were preparing to travel to Syria / IS - territory for it.
Not exact matches
This has really helped and I thank God our Father in Heaven for
actually waking me up
convicting me of being on my way to a legalist... lacking grace, mercy, love towards
people.
Actually, all this judge's reasoning states is that
people shouldn't be
convicted without being proven guilty.
To expand on your first point: it is
actually possible / common to take away rights of
people convicted of crimes.
The premise for Serial is basically the investigation of a murder case from years ago and whether or not the
person convicted was
actually guilty.
The «about to commit a crime» justification for a Terry stop makes it, in practice, much broader than probable cause for an arrest, which requires that the police believe that a crime has
actually already been committed or is in progress, not just that someone is about to commit a crime (a
person may be subjected to a Terry stop even if his actions which tend to show he is about to commit a crime have not yet progressed to the level of an attempted offense for which someone may be
convicted and are not truly imminent).
The prostitute was
actually an LAPD Officer working undercover, and Zambia was arrested and later
convicted of the crime of pandering, as one who «induces, persuades or encourages another
person to become a prostitute.»
Pretrial custody occurs before an accused
person has
actually been
convicted of a criminal offence.
Actually, for everyone interested, I posted a question maybe last week or the week before whether you can be
convicted for both first degree murder and second degree murder for killing a
person, and it was exactly this case that inspired the question.
If, however, you were
convicted, and the Court found that you knew that the victim hadn't died at the time of trial, but you did not raise the fact that the victim wasn't dead, it isn't clear if you could have the original conviction vacated because it was a fair trial and you knew evidence sufficient to get yourself acquitted (which you may have refrained from presenting to avoid conviction on a lesser charge like kidnapping or aggravated assault), and the status of an «actual innocence» grounds for vacating a conviction after trial is hotly disputed, conservatives like the late Justice Scalia generally say «no», liberals generally say «yes», moderates like to say «yes» but make it almost impossible to establish except in rare cases like one where a live
person walks in when there was a murder conviction for killing that
actually living
person.
For example, if you possess a bank account number, credit card number, or PIN, and you «conspire, confederate, or combine with another»
person who
actually commits fraud or theft using that number, then you can be
convicted of the same crime.
To date, there have been 240 exonerations of wrongfully
convicted but
actually innocent inmates due to post-conviction DNA testing which revealed that the
person convicted was not the perpetrator of the crime.
Importantly, this applies whether or not the
convicted person is
actually a named defendant in the action, meaning the conviction operates as proof there was wrongdoing even against non-offending defendants to a civil suit.
The Pennsylvania Innocence Project is a nonprofit 501 (c)(3) organization whose mission includes securing the exoneration, release and restoration to society of
persons who are
actually innocent and have been wrongly
convicted.