Not exact matches
It does not
discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to particular holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders
subject to special rules under the Code (including, but not limited to, insurance companies, tax - exempt organizations, financial institutions, broker - dealers, partners in partnerships (or entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that hold HP Co. common stock, pass - through entities (or investors therein), traders in securities who elect to apply a mark - to - market method of accounting, stockholders who hold HP Co. common stock as part of a «hedge,» «straddle,» «conversion,» «synthetic security,» «integrated investment» or «constructive sale transaction,» individuals who receive HP Co. or Hewlett Packard Enterprise common stock upon the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, holders who are liable for the alternative minimum tax or any holders who
actually or constructively own 5 % or more of HP Co. common stock).
Perhaps if you wanted honest discourse, the
subjects you're bringing up would
actually be interesting to
discuss.
No one
actually makes it; but every serious
subject is
discussed in a manner which implies that they have already found a ridiculous side to it....
As we've
discussed on numerous occasions, the reasons for Johnson's leave are the
subject of several rumors and one Golf.com report that said he was
actually going to be suspended for a positive cocaine test.
Also, give them some credit, they might
actually know a thing or two about the
subject you're
discussing.
Don't
discuss your question with your
subject until you are
actually filming them.
Take heart in the fact that you're all
actually discussing the ethics in the first place, which is far more than can be said for those who have celebrated and misrepresented the contents of a certain stolen ZIP file, and whose ethical discussions on that
subject are rather sparse, if not non-existent.
We'll present a couple illustrations before we'll get to the actual publication we hope to
discuss — one that compares methodology of science - based and «science - denying» climate websites but that also touches on a
subject we personally find far more interesting: what's
actually going on in the Arctic, an area that is not only experiencing major physical consequences of climate change, but that is subsequently also set to be a stage for a cascade of ecological consequences of this climate change — both in the Arctic tundra biome and in the adjacent Arctic marine ecosystem.
Conversations sometimes take longer than they should because the word choice leads you to think you are
discussing one
subject when
actually there is a completely different conversation happening.