Sentences with phrase «actually do things on»

You can also click this area to automatically minimize all your windows so that you can actually do things on the desktop.

See, people who drive a Juke actually do things on the weekend; they don't just sit on the porch and shuck peas.

The point is to figure out a way to take your whole long (maybe overwhelming) bucket list and organize it in ways that inspire and assist you in actually doing the things on the list.

Not exact matches

Some people actually try to do deliberative things whilst sleeping, like turning on the lights in a room.

All I was doing was other people's work all day long, and I never actually got to the things that I wanted to accomplish on that given day.»

Of course, it takes on a lot of the formula of its predecessors, but it actually does have some new things to say.

Happily, he's unlikely to ever try to market the thing, but there are plenty of equally awful product ideas that actually do appear on store shelves, even from major brands.

There's actually a pretty good answer to this question — one that's especially relevant for startups — and a pretty simple guideline that can help you determine exactly (a) when is the best time to start hiring some qualified sales managers and (b) whether the time is right for the CEO to take a step or two back from the front line, hand off the ball to the sales team, and focus on doing more valuable things for the business.

01:29 Farber: The jewelry I just started in the past year, actually when my husband lost his job, I thought up the jewelry and now has been really the most successful thing I've done on Etsy.

«I did the research on it and found a study saying that actually, there's some science behind this: People bond over the things they hate more strongly than over the things they love,» Alper said.

We actually considered moving our company there in the early days... but we didn't, and we're thankful for that now when looking back on things.

«The most important thing that entrepreneurs should do is pick something they care about, work on it, but don't actually commit to turning it into a company until it actually works.»

The complete article is chock full of other suggestions, including specifying what type of feedback you're after (so as to avoid your team telling you about things you don't have the time or power to fix) and most importantly, actually acting on at least some of what they tell you.

EASTWOOD: So anyway, we did that and then I went to Tokyo and where they hadn't been too fond of Americans going there and filming, I sold the governor who was actually the mayor of Tokyo, I sold him on the idea that this would be a great thing for the Japanese people that didn't even know this battle even existed much less how tough it was.

Here's the thing: I actually agree with many of the points Sinek shared in his talk, and I actively write about them often: don't over-indulge on social media, don't binge on Netflix, don't mistake fleeting social interactions for deeply gratifying friendships and relationships, etc..

One of our investors actually told me that if there's something that someone can do even 80 percent better than you can, let them do that thing, and you go focus on the thing that only you can do at 100 percent.

While multitasking might sound like the more productive thing to do, it actually has a negative effect on your ability to focus.

Now don't just give them a cursory glance, actually read through the list of things that you were able to cross off and give yourself a pat on the back for getting them done.

We handle all of things about taking care of a facility that suck like cleaning toilets, taking care of carpets, emptying trash, and finding / managing good employees so you can focus on doing what you're actually in your office to do.

And while so far nothing Trump has actually done on trade is all that significant in the grand scheme of things, perpetually making policy on the basis of a total misunderstanding of the issue is potentially quite dangerous.

Despite its name, when you engage in online currency trading, you do not actually physically trade any currency — the whole thing is recorded as an entry on a computer and netted out based on the market price.

And I get the impression that's actually just about the last thing you'd like to do because Canadians are also saying don't screw up Canadian jobs that depend on trade with the United States.

«One of the things that the china beige book plans to do is to give people a real picture of not just the growth dynamics, but also the labor market, the credit dynamics, the macro implications of Chinese growth, indications of future Chinese demand, implications of commodity markets around the world, we try to give the people a much better picture on what's actually happening instead of just relying on official data and press release».

«It's easy when things are good to say you will buy if prices go down 10 percent, but it's much harder to do when prices actually go down 10 percent and all the headlines focus on additional risks to the downside.»

So, not only do we think you're an idiot for actually believing in a magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky and demands things of you, we think you're an idiot for turning your back on the teachings of this magical, all - powerful, invisible man who lives in the sky.

I know it is not actually covered in the Bible so you may not know this but Darwin did not create the theory of evolution he merely built on the research of others who had been postulating such a thing for over 300 years.

Again, some people are brought up to believe as thier parents did, without perhaps actually doing any collective research on things themselves.

If I even tell them there are things in the universe we do not understand and will never understand (this is actually scientifically proven) they think I am intruding on their atheism.

@Matt, ``... I think they do things with that LABEL of disbelief but are actually acting out on a BELIEF that religion is bad, dangerous, and wrong.

In my opinion, being agnostic on many things, I believe we have much more to learn in Dawkins» area of expertise before we can really get to an educated answer to the issue, but that is just a gut feeling, but with serious consideration to what we don't actually know on the issue from these fields of science.

I guess Kimster is just feeling guilty about his / her own lack of charity and compassion — Sucks to be you, but don't blame your lack of action on those who actually do good thing with their time and money.

National Director Robin Rolls spoke on Premier's News Hour and said: «I think what we've got to do is make sure that if we are offering things that are going to benefit residents in care homes then they actually do that.

So practically, I want to make a bit of space this morning to take on the things I actually do to make time, energy, and inspiration to write.

If your god were actually the way YOU imagine him to be, everyone else would be in agreement on anything to do with this god, yet we see the exact opposite of that — every believer interprets and views things individually with extreme variations.

You also have people who can register as a specfic party and run on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge issue of people really thinking that a vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your vote matters is by voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it actually matter?

We often seem so intent on believing the right things, and knowing the right things, and doing the right things, and forcing other people to believe, know, and do the right things also, that we neglect to actually show love.

Hot Air Ace Actually BD has posted on the next page at 4:09 PM so it looks like he has already done the christian coward thing by not responding here, but you never know maybe he will have a few shots of courage and show up.

Richard Dawkins directly calls on atheists to do such acts, with the idea that it'll lead to more focus on things that can actually be controlled by us, and resulting in a better life for everyone.

It's not just life / human nature / NATURE??? There are a lot of beautiful things in this world, but there is the uglier side as well... and to blaim it all on God — good or bad... well you might as well be living in the old testament... I am surprised there aren't still animal sacrifices to the angry, wrathful god that so many believe in... Oh, another question to the thumpers who believe that «God can be cruel» (And I really don't think Stephen King would say any of his work supports that)... So is God actually «perfect»?

We worship a lot of things down here on planet earth (new gadgets, nature, etc.)... seems to me that if we were to actually behold (there's a word I don't normally use) God and heaven, we would not be able to look at Him because He would be so beyond anything we could imagine and so holy.

Here on this message board, some Christians are attacking Islam and Muslims, I even see some atheists actually (maybe unwittingly) defending us by talking about some jerk things that Christians did in the past.

What I didn't understand is that all of that worrying was keeping me from focusing this wisp of time granted here on earth to do on the things that actually mattered.

Is it not possible that when God involves Himself in the violent and bloody actions of Israel in the Old Testament, it is not because God is actually doing these things, but because God wants to be hung on an accursed cross between two thieves?

It sounds like a terrible thing to do, but when studied in the cultural context, heaping burning coals on someone's head was actually a way of blessing them.

What is actually going on is that you continue to beat yourself up for the things you have done, thinking that God can not love you or forgive you.

The ones that do are usually churches, which don't actually do these things based on facts, or they have a heavy bias towards one religion or group of people.

This means one of two things: 1) you have met one, possibly two sets of gay parents total (which I might actually believe because statistically you could not have come across that many gay parents) and that you certainly don't have enough information to make ANY conclusion on gay parents based on the few that you have met, or 2) you are lying by claiming you have met many gay parents (statistically a low probability), and that they are ALL abusers (a statistical improbability).

And when the flood actually does come upon the earth, the text pretty clearly states that God destroyed all living things that were on the earth (Genesis 7:23).

The statistics are merely sets of data measured in a specific context and at least the person who posted them had the respect to allow us to make our own interpretation rather than inserting his own opinion which is what Buddha actually wanted people to do... not just accept things on blind faith but interpret for themselves and experience for themselves.

And for an interesting look at the problem of categorizing the pill as an abortifacient, check out Libby Anne's piece on the topic, where she notes that «if your goal is to save «unborn babies,» and if you truly believe that a zygote — a fertilized egg — has the same value and worth as you or I — the only responsible thing to do is to put every sexually active woman on the pill,» because the pill actually reduces the number of zygotes naturally rejected by a woman's body.