Advocates, attorneys, professors, and educators who champion macro changes to policy or systems are not
actually expert in these things — even when introduced as such.
Not exact matches
That might sound like the most natural
thing in the world, but according to a clutch of
experts, we're
actually doing our psychological state harm by getting too much rest.
An
expert witness testified that portable coolers
actually made
things worse
in a Hollywood, Fla. nursing home where patients died without air conditioning during Hurricane Irma.
Now, I'm no
expert, but I have a feeling that our time, our money, our sermons, and our political activism would be better spent combating those
things that are
actually threatening marriage
in this country and around the world.
I have
actually read the book, and noted that many
things are missing, like: — any discussion of predecessor attacks & buildup: Essex & MKitrick's 2002 «Taken by Storm», the CEI / Ebell recruitment of McKitrick, the CEI / GMI support of M&M, coaching, promoting M&M
in Washington, DC, M&M being GMI «
experts», being introduced to Inhofe, publicized
in the WSJ, etc, etc... i.e., the material covered by Deep Climate and others, such as CCC, Section 5, and Appendix A. 10.4.
While those who stand
in denial of climate change have failed
in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and evidence of human - induced climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story (
in more than half the cases, according to the academic researchers Boykoff and Boykoff) by quoting one scientist talking about the risks and one purported
expert saying that climate change was not happening — or might
actually be a good
thing.
Since this appears to be a site for slamming science, without
actually bothereing to go into the science, nor to bother to consult
experts in general — rather to pick out the handful that say the «
things we agree with».
While you are an
expert in your practice area, and some of the
things your clients say might not be true, try to refrain from over correcting them by saying
actually.
I don't pretend I'm a change
expert (except on my resume, obviously), but I have had some success
in (1) convincing lawyers to just try the new shiny
thing, and (2)
actually incorporate it into practice.