Sentences with phrase «actually get some policies»

So until we can actually get the policy changes to make the world a healthier place, the family has to be a bastion of protection for children in the home.

To actually get a policy, you will have to answer many more questions about your health, your family medical history, your use of alcohol and tobacco, your financial status and any dangerous activities you're involved in.

If all you need life insurance for is to cover your funeral and other final expenses, you can actually get a policy very cheaply.

If you are not truthful about your violation or claims history, you might see lower estimated rates than when you actually get your policy.

You may get one of the lowest quotes from them but you really have to struggle hard to actually get the policy because maybe you won't qualify due to their strict underwriting guidelines.

Not exact matches

The problem, he said, is «you've got a portion of Congress whose policies... just want to, you know, leave things alone, they actually want to accelerate these trends.»

The University of Calgary's School of Public Policy recently pointed out that Canadian corporations actually do more taking over than getting swallowed.

But actually, Evans» point of clarification on this issue is soooo important, since it gets at one of the biggest confusions about monetary policy and interest rates today.

So here's a modest proposal: why doesn't the federal government get things rolling by pushing for reform of supply management — that convoluted mess of federal and provincial policies that actually make it an offence for farmers to sell milk and poultry across provincial boundaries?

Personally, I'm actually surprised that obama's done a decent job on the foreign policy front considering his utter inexperience prior to his 2008 run, but I really don't get how you can allege that Romney's a decent guy (and thus presumably not a complete liar) but not qualified to be president.

That would actually get some attention and maybe even get CNN to change the policies..

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

A few years ago, a reader got in touch about an issue she had with KLM, and they actually ended up changing their car seat policy.

Now it's back to the business of actually making politics work — proposing policies, persuading people that they're good ideas and getting them passed.

I think it's politics getting in the way of actually having good public policy take effect.

That I get consulted on party policy making a fair bit is actually really cool, I love the idealistic democracy they operate by, and am using it.

I'd actually consider contacting the Parliamentary Candidates Association and asking them how somebody with views that far out of whack with Liberal Democrat policy and philosophy got to be an approved candidate in the first place...

Unfortunately, as you say, actually nothing has changed in Labour's detailed «policy offer» so far — and won't unless the Left gets its collective act together and intervenes in the, deliberately Byzantine complexity, of Labour's policy making processes.

After all, what use are progressive policies if you've not got the power to actually implement them?

The two priorities after this leadership election must be: 1) Getting new members actively involved in the party (and I'm guilty here too) 2) Democratising the party so that member involvement is actually meaningful 3) Policy!

But now he is Leader all we get is John Mcdonnell's celebrity economist roadshow — which is NOT actually the same thing as broadly based economic policy creation at all.

Still, as Albany turns to policy in the remaining few session days left, what can actually get done after both legislative leaders were forced to step down following arrests in separate corruption scandals remains a question hanging over lawmakers as well as Cuomo.

Veritas is finished and was really pretty much from the beginning, it never had any real raison d'etre other than as the Robert Kilroy Silk Fanclub and now that he has abandoned them what is there left for them, The English Democrats are somewhat lightweight policy wise, UKIP actually despite the Kilroy Fiasco got the second biggest gain in total number of votes for any party after the Liberal Democrats and at 2.5 % are now up to where the Liberal Party was in the 1950's, on the other hand the Liberal Democrats have a lacklustre leadership campaign with a lot of scandals, are divided on economic policy and show every sign of being ready to implode.

Republicans need get over the Obama derangement - syndrome and actually put some real policies before the voters.

«I do think the Labour party does have a problem of announcing very small policies that they're trying to get a daily headline out of and actually the problem is they don't really capture the public's imagination,» he told the BBC.

«Voters must be wondering when on earth the Tories will actually get round to discussing some actual policies.»

He told Progress magazine: «Let's be clear: We don't think that Ukip's right, not on immigration and not on Europe - so the first thing you've got to be really careful of doing is... saying things that suggest that they're kind of justified in their policy because what you're actually going to do is validate their argument when in fact you don't believe in it.»

«They can't write policy that actually makes sense, they can't implement the policies they do manage to write, they can't get their stories straight, and today we've learned that they can't close a deal, and they can't count votes,» Schumer added.

Furthermore, since most people vote based on party and not based on MP, we need some party discipline to ensure that the party policies the electorate voted for will actually get enacted.

The way to get to the policies that I care about and most New Yorkers care about is really funding our schools, actually having a progressive tax code, funding our infrastructure.

And, of course, the people who make real policies — the ones that are actually going to be put into practice — are those in government; plenty of people get jobs in the civil service after training as scientists.

So in the May issue, Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute, he writes an essay in which he raises sort of the specter that potentially, in the decades to come, that if we are not careful, that these problems with maintaining a sufficient food supply could get bad enough that it actually would threaten the state of civilization globally; that it just could cause widespread chaos, cause a large number of failed states and trigger [an] enormous number of problems down the line.

«We can say that Enhanced Weathering is not just a crazy idea but could actually help climate policy, yet it is still a challenge to get a precise understanding of the involved processes,» says Amann.

Lomborg claims in his rebuttal that «Holdren could find little but a badly translated word and a necessary specification for nuclear energy production in this chapter».8 Actually, as my original critique indicated to the extent practical in the space available, and as Lomborgs rebuttal and this response make even plainer, his energy chapter is so permeated with misunderstandings, misreadings, misrepresentations, and blunders of other sorts that it can not be considered a positive contribution to public or policy - maker understanding, notwithstanding its managing to get right a few (already well known) truths about the subject.

Since the Rana Plaza factory collapse in Bangladesh, Zara has actually gotten stricter with their policies to ensure ethical productions.

The logic of standards - based reform is «fundamentally at odds» with that of loose - coupling, because reform violates the premise that teachers should be buffered from outside interference and makes «what actually gets taught a matter of public policy and open political discourse.»

But then you might have a discipline policy that says, well actually no you don't get any chance, you get a warning, then you're going to go to time out or you'll get a detention or whatever.

Harvard's new gift policy allows for donations to be credited to an individual's own school, but actually get earmarked for another at Harvard if the donor wishes to support a different academic discipline.

Ferfolja adds: «There is also a [New South Wales Department of Education] document called the Controversial Issues in Schools policy and that also talks about having to get parental permission if you're going to raise a controversial issue, sensitive topic — so what does that actually mean for teachers?

The federal government is most certainly guilty as well for creating an alphabet soup of acronyms that bogs down stories about national education policy with explanations and parentheticals about what all the abbreviations mean before readers ever get to the point of whether the policies are actually working.

«My study is an argument about how a very expensive policy, grade retention, may actually undermine our shared goals of ensuring even child gets a quality education,» she replied.

It seems to us that whenever someone proposes actually holding teachers accountable for teaching (e.g. allowing principals to walk into their classrooms more than once a year to evaluate them; having real consequences for ineffective teaching or egregious behavior; etc.) there is a tsunami of push - back and vitriol that is knee - jerk, sadly effective and incredibly depressing if you know the very real impact their «teacher protection at all costs» policies have on students, especially low - income students who get the worst of the worst in our «zip code» - based system.

What does not work might be a surprise: harsh, zero - tolerance policies, added security equipment and patrolmen — in the absence of the other interventions like changing the school climate and getting kids to practice positive interventions — do little or nothing, and sometimes actually increase rates of bullying.

«The department makes sure that money goes through those programs to get through to the places that need it, and without the department there's no way to actually administer the hundreds of programs that are funded through the department,» said Scott Sargrad, director of standards and accountability for education policy at the Center for American Progress and former deputy assistant secretary for policy and strategic initiatives in the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education at the U.S. Department of Education.

«We are in the early stages of developing education policy, and we haven't actually got to academies, believe it or not.

And whenever I get a chance to hang with music folks we have the best conversations — and by that, I mean that I hear some absolutely jaw - dropping, eye - popping stuff about what is actually happening out in their schools with respect to educational policy and practice.

Because of GoodReads ridiculous policy and no interest in actually getting rid of nasty people using their website, they ignore pleas for help of TRUE harassment.

So those screams in the canyons of New York, the ones from the publishers, get heard by the people who are actually taking a bath because of these new policies — the writers (and their agents).

And yet, they still got so many complaints that their books «aren't on Kindle» that in the end they had to make a huge change their store's selling policies, changing the way they'd sold e-books for over a decade and disgruntling many of their oldest customers, in order to put their e-books on Amazon so more people would actually buy them.

Banks and other financial institutions get away with it, says Morley, because they ask consumers to agree to lengthy privacy policies filled with fine print no one actually reads.