Sentences with phrase «actually invested in the company»

According to the article, Bezos is actually investing in the company, helping them expand their newsroom.

It was so important to me to have a resource available like this for my own family and to share with you, that I actually invested in the company and serve as an advisor to help them choose products that moms and families need and use.

This money is actually invested in company stocks.

The value of dealing with a passionate person actually invested in the company they built from the ground up is often underestimated.

Ron: [29:36] Yes, they were part of the lab, and then Mishcon de Reya did an enterprise license, and then they actually invested in the company.

This money is actually invested in company stocks.

Not exact matches

Because some of these people may come to me a year later and send me a tweet and say «Hey, I think your advice helped, and here's how the company's doing,» and I may actually subsequently invest in that company.

When the IT staff are invested in company sales goals, they are more excited about, engaged in, and open to new developing new solutions that will actually be used to their full potential.

Angels and serial entrepreneurs in each of these cities will then invest $ 250K to $ 1M in each of 150 - 200 local companies that pass a base level of scrutiny from those that have actually been involved in building real businesses before.

The premise behind an immediate annuity is simple: You invest a lump sum of money with an insurance company (although you would actually do so through an adviser, a broker or insurance agent) and in return you receive a guaranteed monthly payment for life regardless of how the financial markets perform.

Rich Uncles believes that with the ease and transparency of the internet, the company can deliver a real estate product that has roughly 10 % more of the investment amount actually being invested in real estate rather than being paid to others in the form of commissions and reimbursements.

The reality is that few companies desiring growth are actually willing to invest adequately in the quality of process and playbook needed for success.

True, this has led to an explosion in new companies far beyond the levels seen previously, which is entirely expected — lower barriers to entry to any market means more total entries — but this has actually made it even more difficult for venture capitalists to invest in seed rounds: most aren't capable of writing massive numbers of seed checks; the amounts are just too small to justify the effort.

And she pointed out that while NASA spoke of investing in fifty - fifty partnerships with commercial space companies, it was actually spending nine times what the commercial space companies were spending — that the partnerships were actually ninety - ten.

We brought together our business editor Ben Popper, and our science editor, Liz Lopatto, to discuss what happens when you mix a flood of dumb money eager to invest in anything «disruptive» with life science companies that can actually impact our bodies and health.

In Morgan Stanley's latest poll of individual investors, we found that 75 % were interested in sustainable investing, and 71 % believe companies that focus on the environment and social goals will actually earn better returnIn Morgan Stanley's latest poll of individual investors, we found that 75 % were interested in sustainable investing, and 71 % believe companies that focus on the environment and social goals will actually earn better returnin sustainable investing, and 71 % believe companies that focus on the environment and social goals will actually earn better returns.

Few people actually studied the finances and underlying businesses of the companies that they invested in.

We believe in focussing on what we can actually predict the outcome: invest in great companies, managed by trustworthy people.

This is not a theory, it's actually being used today by angels and angel funds to invest in west coast companies.

Factoring in the true amount of capital invested in the company reveals that on the contrary, it actually makes negative economic earnings.

Why bother investing in a company with thousands of employees when you can invest in a company that is actually just one person?

I actually take pride in what I do, and I'm totally invested in the company's business and committed to its cause.

This money that I invest, it never actually ends up in the company but rather in the hands of other investors from whom the shares are bought.

I actually worked for a company that let you invest in the company stock and I would hear stories of people putting 50 % or more in the company stock.

The stock market can be very fickle and tracking down the top five dividend paying stocks in 2012, can be difficult, very few people will actually have their money invested in all of the top paying dividend stocks at any one time, but keeping a close watch on the markets will provide at least some insight into which companies are heading in the right direction and able to provide a good rate of return for your investment.

I'm actually hoping for a broader market pullback over the next couple months, which would surely bring down the prices on some of the high quality companies I'm currently invested in and also those that I long to own a piece of.

That said, Mauboussin presents some striking data about «persistence» in high ROIC companies that suggests investing in high ROIC companies is not necessarily a short ride to the poor house, and might actually work as an investment strategy.

In the case of bonds, as you are just lending money to the company or government, you are actually not becoming a part of it and hence the investment you made in terms of bond is not affected by the rise or fall in the company's value and at the end of the maturity date, you will receive back the amount you invested while purchasing the bonIn the case of bonds, as you are just lending money to the company or government, you are actually not becoming a part of it and hence the investment you made in terms of bond is not affected by the rise or fall in the company's value and at the end of the maturity date, you will receive back the amount you invested while purchasing the bonin terms of bond is not affected by the rise or fall in the company's value and at the end of the maturity date, you will receive back the amount you invested while purchasing the bonin the company's value and at the end of the maturity date, you will receive back the amount you invested while purchasing the bond.

But when you actually crunch the numbers, you'll realize how ridiculous it is to blindly invest in a company like McDonalds for the next 50 years.

sir, actually after reading your post best equity fund have invested MONTHLY SIP in following funds 01] BIRLA SUNLIFE FRONTLINE EQUITY FUND RS 3000 / 02] FRANKLINE SMALLER COMPANY FUND RS 4000 / 03] FRANKLINE PRIMA PLUSE RS 4000 / 04] HDFC BALANCE RS 3000 / 05] AXIS LONG TERM EQUITY RS 2000 / 06] ICICI PRUDENCIAL LONG TERM EQUITY RS 2000 / 07] RELIANCE OPPORTUNITY FUND RS 2000 / After stoping my old SIP and thats why i am asking wheter to invest hold amont in above SIP.

Actually, it's mystifying why people even take on the challenge of analyzing & investing in distressed property companies.

You've got to screen for & invest in companies that can actually fund themselves on a sustainable basis, otherwise you'll face an almost irresistible stock decline, b) For management, there is a solution: Just buy some land.

Unfortunately, many employees who invest in the company 401 (k) plan have no idea what their fees actually are.

When investing, it is nice if you actually use the companies that you invest in.

Dismiss all such forecasts and concentrate on what's actually happening to the companies in which you've invested.»

Hopefully, a great story represents an above average long - term growth opportunity (or a catalyst, and / or a lower risk / uncorrelated investment), a great stock ensures you invest in a company & management team which can actually leverage, exploit & deliver genuine long - term shareholder value from this opportunity, while a great price requires you exercise the patience to buy (& sell) at the right time.

We will never get to a place where everyone invested in index funds, because 1, people actually own these companies and stock generally comes with voting rights, 2, other people think they can beat the market and some of those people run investing funds.

However, if you actually have a strong & quite specific view (for example, you believe in the blockchain, but not Bitcoin), you may want to focus instead on investing in a sub-set of companies — or even a single company — that best reflects / exploits that view.

OK, so if investing in companies whose stock trades cheaply relative to its earnings or companies whose stock trades at or below book value has historically provided a return greater than that of the stock market as a whole, which of these two strategies should I choose and how should I go about actually implementing it?

[Two fee issues to monitor: i) Capitalizing (& amortizing) IPO expenses as a balance sheet «asset» is a nice gimmick for investment managers to collect additional fees — however, it's far less prevalent these days & actually may not even be permissible any longer, and ii) if the company invests in JVs which are also managed by the investment manager (or a related party), shareholders should ensure two layers of fees aren't imposed].

If you invest in European car insurance as an optional extra, make sure that you'll actually be covered in the countries you'll be visiting as different companies adopt a different stance on which countries are included and which are not.

This game actually almost didn't happen, Valve could not find a publisher because all publishing companies did not want to invest in such an ambitious undertaking.

The way you spoke in your previous comment it sounded as if you had actually invested in Chinese companies but had short sold them when you realised that all was not well.

Oil companies are showing more and more interest in actually investing in ethanol companies and contributing to research.

Less red tape / limited time / rules the better if you want to actually encourage companies to invest in innovative new rules and technology.

The other piece of it was, if they're pitching to investors in my conference room, first I've got a cool office where it makes them looks good, so they might actually want to be there, and then I get to meet the investors, and meeting rich people who want to invest in companies is not a bad idea when you are trying to represent those companies.

If you (or your marketing company) don't invest the time in actually building out your profiles with all the necessary information, this can be viewed as spammy.

Even if the firm doesn't decide to invest in you, there is much there to help you to develop your company, to meet like - minded start - ups and to gain invaluable insight into what the lawyers and their clients actually want from you.

What if you want a deeper dive into what is actually happening with your money, like the types of companies, funds, and assets you're investing in?

You should know that the reason the company charges so much more is they are actually investing the difference in the markets and making returns so they can easily pay you back and still stay in the green.