Sentences with phrase «actually lands it hits»

Not exact matches

Asuka did as good as possible to make it look like she kicked Sasha in the air; if she had not done the «kick maneuver» Sasha would have actually landed on Asuka (but angle of camera was such, that we saw an «obviously missed kick» and we talking now about a «botch») plus Sasha right away put her arms out in a way to land safely than make it look like a «harsh hit on the floor» with the small roll BUT at same time she did hit the top rope with her feet so either it was a not intentional slow down (most likely) or she was so good that she intentionally used top rope to slow herself down (unlikely but still possible)

In terms of the Over / Under, the two most lopsided bets on the Under actually hit this week (contrary to last week), with Newcastle / Aston Villa ending 0 - 0 and Leicester City / Chelsea landing on 2 goals.

Another that made my list last year but didn't actually hit the silver screen, First Man brings the story of Neil Armstrong (played by Ryan Gosling) and the first lunar landing through the lens of La La Land director Damien Chazelle.

Affinity is actually the chance of landing critical hits when attacking monsters.

Sister company Land Rover is also jumping on the virtual reality bandwagon, but in a different way: it's using iPhone - powered headsets to show new car shoppers around a full - scale virtual model of a 2015 that's yet to actually hit the dealer floor.

The Land Speed Cruiser actually ran out of usable pavement before it hit top speed!

Rewarding in the fact that if you actually manage to land a hit you are immediately thanking to your lucky stars.

For once, you can actually appreciate being killed by a knife, knowing that you have to give your murderer props for managing to land the hit just right.

This means that a pole with a damage count of nine or 12 could actually deliver a damage count of 36 points, whereas a snazzy axe may only land 28 per hit.

Before I could dig in, the session resumed with Inhofe, described as «the best pilot in the Senate» — who, among other violations, once landed on a closed runway, and «damn near hit» a truck whose driver «actually wet his britches.»

Now I am not a great fan of the aggregated tide gauge record seeing as it relies on so few gauges (as cited) most with short histories (as cited) or have moved (as cited) or have been interpolated (as cited) To globally aggregate such low grade information only compounds the errors However, anyone working on flood defence work would use a tide gauge as it provides a more accurate record of the place where the sea actually hits the land, where people live, as opposed to satellites which measure open sea.

And I think you hit the nail on the head with: «5) Once we scientifically - oriented Skeptics accept the reality of the Atmospheric «greenhouse effect» we are, IMHO, better positioned to question the much larger issues which are: a) HOW MUCH does CO2 contribute to that effect, b) HOW MUCH does human burning of fossil fuels and land use changes that reduce albedo affect warming, and, perhaps most important, c) Does the resultant enhanced CO2 level and higher mean temperature actually have a net benefit for humankind?»