This means their money will
actually lose value over time if inflation increases at historical rates of between 2 % and 3 % annually.
In the short term, riskier investments such as stocks or stock mutual funds may
actually lose value.
The basic concept is simple, but the way cars
actually lose value is complicated.
Because interest rates on savings accounts rarely (if ever) match the rate of inflation, by simply placing money in an account, it will
actually lose value over time.
«It's not just pollution, it's
actually losing the value of the stuff they bought in the first place.»
The main benefit of physical gold is that it never
actually loses value.
First, they held that Port Colborne properties had not
actually lost any value due to the nickel contamination.
During a major financial recession such as in 2008 - 2009, most homes
actually lost value, meaning their owners saw their equity decrease.
Not exact matches
Taking it one step further, if the investors had received 1.5 X or 2.0 X liquidation preference, they would have
actually earned 1.5 x and 2.0 x return, respectively, despite the startup
losing value.
And though spot commodity / equity ratios (like the ratio of the spot gold price to the XAU) are
actually supportive of commodity stock prices in and of themselves, the historical tendency is for these ratios to
lose some of their informative
value when commodity prices themselves have run to extremes and real interest rates begin to turn.
Perhaps your deferred taxes have grown so large as a result of a very small cost basis that selling and switching into an investment you expect to earn even three percentage points or more over the next decade will
actually cost you money as a result of the principle
value lost to the IRS.
Since the Syriac fathers see the old order of sacrifices as having
lost its former
value, it is curious how firmly both Aphrahat and Ephrem held a tradition which is strange to the New Testament, namely, that Christ as High Priest «according to the order of Melchizedek»,
actually received the Aaronic priesthood by unbroken succession of imposition of hands through John the Baptist, who was of priestly family; when the former priesthood was repudiated, the power continued in Christ and he passed it on to the Apostles.
They have a longer shelf life: Since smoothies still contain all of the fiber of the fruits and vegetables, you can
actually store smoothies longer without
losing too much nutritional
value.
I absolutely love mine, it's a beautiful piece to have and as I told my husband, they're
actually a great investment because Chanel handbags never
lose their
value as the company always puts up prices each year.
It's
actually a lament for another
lost American
value replaced by digital second - rateness, this time the cherished Kodachrome color film process by which photography used to look 100 times better than it does now.
And while my car was the largest possession I had at the time, it was continually
losing value and
actually decreasing my wealth.
The
value of your portfolio would have dropped drastically but the only ones who
actually lost money are the ones who sold.
While your investment may post gains over time, it may
actually be
losing value if it does not at least keep pace with the rate of inflation.
Actual cash
value used to be common, but the general expectation is that insurance will return you to the place you were before the loss by
actually replacing the property that was
lost.
Instead of the maximization of shareholder
value (the number one goal of a corporation according to Aswath Damodaron) we witnessed a good ol' boy board of directors sit back and allow an entrenched management team to either
lose or steal millions of assets (at one million a year in salary on a 10MM company, its stealing or akin to stealing no matter what
actually happened to the $ 8 per share of liquidation
value you mentioned that the company had... just one year ago)... and it raises goosebumps wondering where the millions of dollars
actually went... just as I am sure Bernie Madoff's investors are wondering where there money is...
As their homes
lost value, they
lost equity, with many homeowners
actually falling underwater, meaning that they owed more on their mortgages than what their homes were currently worth.
Knowing your
actually value will save you tons of time and
lost money in the long run, even though you might get rejected more.
Since the redemption structure is
actually identical for the $ 89 and fee - free cards, I won't
lose any of my points»
value when I make the product change.
As shown above, the SPG and Marriott conversions
actually brings you more
value so for many of these hotel programs, I don't think it's worth it to
lose value when transferring to Aeroplan.
Moreover, you want to make sure that you use your weekend certificate at properties that are
actually worth it (you don't want to use your two free nights on a low category property and
lose out on hundreds of dollars of
value).
The economist's role is not to establish how much people should
value items gained or
lost, but to calculate based on observing how much these people
actually value these items.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are
losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT
values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends
actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
Could it be that in seeking and attaining more things, we have
actually lost something of inestimable
value?
I won't get into a philosophical discussion of whether we are
actually happier or have better or worse
values, but I do think we're spoiled, pampered, and live in fear of
losing any little thing, because we seemingly have everything — cheap.
With information - governance lifecycles, Wallack said legal departments can effectively store and manage their data: «You can reduce costs by transferring eroding data that's
actually losing context and increasing in risk over time to cheaper - tiered storage methods, while eliminating data that has no
value and has
lost all of its context.
«Actual cash
value» (ACV) pays only for what the items were worth at the time they were damaged or stolen, minus the deductible, while «replacement cost coverage» pays what it
actually costs to replace the belongings you
lost, minus the deductible.
Ideally, however, your safety net is growing at a steady rate year over year, and instead of sitting in a bank account and
losing value, it's
actually making you money.
Because many cars
lose value quickly, you may find yourself in a situation where you owe more on a loan than what the car is
actually worth — for instance, you buy a $ 30,000 car and in one year it is
valued at $ 22,000, but you still have $ 25,000 left on your own.
Safe assets
lose more
value over time, and investors who look to protect their savings with safe assets are
actually putting their portfolio at risk.
Because these accounts are similar to a mutual fund, that means you could
actually lose some of the cash -
value of the plan as well.
Because she did not receive the policy
value, the widow
actually ended up
losing her home.
Actually this example is very much over simplified and depreciation calculations for cars are a little more complex partly because as soon as you drive your new car home, it
loses a large chunk of its sticker price
value on the second hand market (and depreciation reflects real world pricing).
Replacement
value protection will provide you with compensation to your
lost or damaged belongings based on how much you
actually spend to replace them.
«The new guidance
actually has little impact — it just means that Glimcher is getting a higher
value for the malls that are to be sold this year, which increases the dilution from
lost NOI,» says Richard Moore, a REIT analyst with RBC Capital Markets.