what you may call «harassment» is
actually normal questions which due to the fact you have no answers may feel like harassment to you.
Not exact matches
I think having
questions about John as a gospel are very
normal — sorry people that disagree — but you have to
actually study this phenomenon to have any valid input.
There have been days when I even
question whether it would be easier to not be vegan anymore or to put my kids in school and be more «
normal», but I know that would never
actually work for me / us or sit right with me.
The reason for the difference is most likely tactical considerations — people answer Labour to a
normal voting intention
question because that's the party they really support, but know that they happen to live in a seat where Labour could never win, so
actually vote Liberal Democrat.
... For example,
questioning someone's conclusions at the end of a talk is
normal here, but in Japan that would
actually be seen as quite aggressive,» she says.
I've been
questioned and prodded about my choices and I've
actually tried very hard to be
normal and it never worked.
They've no sense of gravity, of weight of the atmosphere, really, of nothing that is
actually our real physical world, and as here, it seems perfectly
normal because it is «well - known'that Solar energy heats the Earth and with an extra bit added to the 2nd Law to explain it, and argued for, it's hardly ever
questioned in depth to get to the principles at the heart of the problem.
You
actually have to practice until it's a
normal response to the
questions.
I usually affirm that it is probably
normal but the
question should
actually -LSB-...]