«Many experts are still confident that China will
actually peak its emissions before [its] own target of 2030,» he says.
Not exact matches
Okay, one little nit - picky issue with Q2 is that O2 and N2
actually DO absorb infrared radiation, just at shorter wavelengths than matter for the Earth's infrared
emission spectrum (3 - 27 microns, with a
peak around 9 microns or so).
Okay, one little nit - picky issue with Q2 is that O2 and N2
actually DO absorb infrared radiation, just at shorter wavelengths than matter for the Earth's infrared
emission spectrum (3 - 27 microns, with a
peak around 9 microns or so).
Anthropogenic
emissions of CO2 are increasing, and accelerating, and current proposals for reducing them present no plausible scenario in which
emissions will
actually peak and decline in anywhere near the time frame that is required to avoid what are generally considered «dangerous» levels of CO2 (although points 1 - 3 above suggest that the current levels are more dangerous than has been generally believed).
Has anyone
actually done any «real» laboratory experiments with CO2 mixtures, using a real 288 Kelvin thermal radiation source that is putting out a 10.1 micron
peak wavelength
emission spectrum at about 390 W / m ^ 2.
In «high income regions» (OECD90, REF) sulfur
emissions have already passed their
peaks and are
actually declining at present.
First of all, we'd need to see
emissions going down... Then after that, we'd need several years, maybe even a decade, to be confident that it was
actually a
peak.»