Sentences with phrase «actually read the question»

Try please actually reading my question next time.

If we actually read the question is says a «proven track record of effectively increasing student growth.»

Not exact matches

(I apologize if this question was already answered — I didn't read through all the comments, and it's been about a week since I actually read this post via Feedly on my phone)

It's hard to believe, but just five years ago, I was being asked questions like, «do people actually read blogs», or «can you justify blogging with hard ROI?»

its fairly rare that you actually ask a question, most of the time it's just insults and I really do nt bother reading your posts..

this system of spiritual beings is a multi-staged hierarchy, which spans 50 dimensions and every spiritual plane attached to these dimensions, with a supreme, male god - being who is above the 50th dimension, and many of these beings pretend to be «good» but are manipulators who impose suffering, and through brainwashing, force, and authority / domination, they condition people to believe that suffering is «good» for a «learning experience» (read the article that is in the link i shared) but i am left wondering why so few actually question this?

I am a Mormon who has actually read the Book of Mormon, and I encourage anyone with doubts or questions to actually read it for themselves and study the churches teachings from primary sources — the scriptures, words of the prophets, the church itself — rather than trusting 3rd party interpretations or claims of understanding Mormonism.

Another modified form of this skill is the student who reads ahead in the professor's notes and asks a question from the upcoming notes so that they professor will say, «Excellent question, that is actually my next point!»

Read up on basic evolutionary theory to understand your «blob» questions (though you did a straw man perversion of the concept in a lame attempt to discredit it without actually getting an answer).

That modern Christians have adopted a more convenient «convenant» (read: interpretation) actually raises more questions, rather than render mine «inaffective».

If you cling to the irrational belief that it's the literal word of a diety, and you read it and actually decide you want to follow it, be self - aware enough to understand when rational people question your morality and intelligence.

Others say they have read the Bible cover to cover and think it's a fine novel but question the fact that it actually is the word of God.

I don't mean to sound snippy — again, all for links and such and I do read a fair amount of what people reference — but sometimes it f = just feels like a cope - out for people actually thinking for themselves or having to face questions they don't have rehearsed answers to.

When I read your question for the first time, I got very nervous (a few times, actually).

I didn't read this as questioning her motives or character at all, but rather the mindset that places such a high value on suffering that it may result in actually adding to that suffering needlessly.

Nice try with the apple thing, but if you actually went and read the scriptures in question you would quickly realize that «apple» is not the word used.

honest question, how much of what you read do you actually believe?

Ask for a consent form ahead of time so you can actually read it and ask any questions that may arise.

So questions popped up when I read some of those studies that actually showed a higher (although barely but still a higher) perinatal rate with hospital births.

Mel Stride (Con, his best quality is his name) reads out a whips» question although he has the good grace not to actually read it off a sheet.

Reading between the lines, the report raises questions about how much Ulster actually lost during last year's «Cahill Sales Tax Crisis,» which deprived the county of a one percent sales tax surcharge in December and January.

That sounds like a weird question, but some consumers may actually have such worries, thanks to a constant barrage of news headlines suggesting that synthetic chemicals — an even some naturally occurring ones — are... [Read More]

If you read that one sentence, objectively, it's actually a valid question.

I have a 2 and a 4 year old and thank goodness they are healthy but i really question the multivitamins because they have flouride (which is a poison according to my toothpaste tube) and also because i recently read that a lot of synthetic vitamins contain petroleum, and other byproducts that actually can cause cancer.

just found your article today and read it along with all the questions and responses — actually found it when i was googling about not eating enough calories preventing you from losing weight etc. which brings me to my question..

You can click on any of the photos to read more information about them, and since Kevin actually owns some of these things, please don't hesitate to ask if you have questions about a -LSB-...]

Also, end the profile with a question they have to answer, this will allow you to know if they actually read your profile or not.

I always chuckle when I read the term «expert dating advice» as it begs the question; how exactly is one qualified to be a dating adviser let alone a dating advice EXPERT, and what actually constitutes an expert dating adviser, dating coach or dating «counselor»?

Which leads me to my main question that keeps popping up when I read your posts: When you leave your house, how many men do you actually smile at, nod at, flirt with in a day?

The short answer to this question is actually pretty simple — yes, you need to read a comprehensive Positive Singles Editor Review so that you can find out if this particular dating site can cater to your own specific needs.

so even though we both did the guided communication, this free weekend wont actually let you read the personal emails like they have in the past, even after completely all the pre set up questions and cant stands and must have blahs.

The question is: Was slicing The Hobbit, a charming book which could easily be read in an afternoon, into three parts over almost eight hours of cinema actually a good idea?

It has been shown that Thinking Hat Questions promote higher thinking and reading skills in children and yet when it came to actually finding lots of these resources on this website, I could not find any and so I am planning to write worksheets each night and share them with everyone.

If, on the other hand, somebody has carried out an experiment himself or herself, analyzed the data, made a prediction, and saw whether it came out correctly, if somebody is doing history and actually does some interviewing himself or herself — oral histories — then reads the documents, listens to it, goes back and asks further questions, writes up a paper — that's the kind of thing that's going to adhere.

But Richter says students didn't actually have to read the passage, because the question was multiple - choice.

For example, if you show the learner a page of text, and then ask them some multiple choice questions about the text's content, what you're actually testing is whether they can remember what they've read; you still have no idea whether they can actually use this information.

More likely is that those new tests will be scored by those vaunted automated scoring technologies, machines that can assess student answers to open - ended questions without being able to actually read them.

(Although to be fair to tutors, Duncan didn't say whether the tutoring in question was actually related to reading and math.)

For those students who are «reading» frustration level texts with 1 - on - 1 support, my question is, are THEY actually reading it?

Some children can answer questions correctly by relying on their verbal thinking skills, not on what they actually understood by reading.

Actually, missed your last post and now that I've read it I see you pretty much covered this question.

Barnes Actually, your question is better than I first thought when I read it.

I would hazard a guess that most freebie downloads are impulse decisions that have less to do with actually being interested in the book in question, and more to do with the psychological aspect of acquisitiveness, just to own it, rather than read it.

The study couldn't show how many of the books the students actually read, but the students who sent in reading logs answering brief questions about the books showed even stronger achievement gains.

Coben answers the questions his fans want to know... how to get autographed (and personalized) copy of his books, are there any future Myron Bolitar novels planned, and does he actually read emails sent to him by fans.

Having read your post — which is wonderfully thorough and informative by the way — you've actually answered several questions I did intend to pose to an author such as yourself, and I was wondering if I might have your permission to use a small part of your post in my article?

And if it becomes a question of «who gets my money», I'd just as soon donate to the library rather than blow $ 9.99 a month for access to books I will most likely not actually read in any given month.

Chris Sims called it «without question the best Archie story since Archie Meets the Punisher,» adding, «It goofs on the established format in a way that's actually really funny, to the point where it's the first Archie comic I've read in a long time that I not only laughed out loud while I was reading, but laughed later when I was telling friends about it.»

I will read reviews from people actually using the Good e-reader but my primary question is this: I have a large library of Kindle books; can I read them on the Good e-reader?

But, again, not knowing how normalized pages read compares to the number of downloads makes this an interesting mental exercise but really doesn't answer the question of how many of the borrows are actually being read all the way through.