Sentences with phrase «actually reduce warming»

Not exact matches

If all the brewery's CO2 could be stored in this way, the ethanol could become a biofuel to burn, one that actually reduces the amount of CO2 in the air and that seems to be one of the last hopes on offer to keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius.

Indeed, Health Canada's black - box warming may contribute to reducing prescriptions because of parents» fears about their children's health, while these medications may actually protect them.

Solid programs include targeted efforts to reduce the likelihood of injury via means like mobility warm - ups, supplemental stretching recommendations, specific progressions, fluctuations in training stress, and alternative exercises («plan B») in case you aren't quite ready to execute «Plan A.» For me personally, I attribute a lot of my progress to the fact that at one point, I actually went over eight years without missing a planned lift.

@barbecue - that's actually correct, at least indirectly — the lighter oil weights are used to improve fuel economy and fuel economy ratings are driven (at least in part) due to the desire to reduce greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.

To curb global warming from causing the melting, we need action that cuts into the natural carbon recycling process to actually reduce the overload.

This is indeed as you mention important to actually tip the balance towards «reduced evaporation in a moister and warmer world».

Since, on average, aerosols have a cooling effect (although some absorbing aerosols like black carbon (soot) are actually adding to global warming), reducing current aerosol levels (particularly sulphates) is equivalent to an extra warming effect.

This would serve multiple purposes, of (a) weaning us from dependence on foreign oil and simultaneously depleting terror - exporting countries of their revenue stream, (b) reducing other pollutants besides CO2, (c) encouraging a more gradual and less economically disastrous transition from an economony based on a finite resource, (d) slow global warming, (e) move us in the direction of a VAT tax rather than an income tax (actually, personally I don't think e is such a great thing, but as many conversative groups favor it, I don't see why they would oppose a revenue - neutral tax on fossil fuels.

I ask this since the latest study I have read indicates that global warming would actually reduce power of hurricanes and cyclones since there would be less sheer between cold and warm air.

Apparently gyres may have been reducing the rise in sea level along the coasts as the climate warms even though the overall sea level was rising — and much of the sea level rise that we attributed to earlier in the twentieth century may actually have happened later in the twentieth century.

I guess the non-global warming factors I was thinking of are the things that reduce hurricanes even when SST are rising, such as wind factors (I don't actually know what I'm talking about here).

These plants are actually worse for global warming than the dirty ones, since you can't scrub CO2, and the dimming effect of the particulates is reduced.

Mauritsen said the warming of the upper ocean and the atmosphere during the summer through reduced cooling around Europe results in the stronger transport of heat into the Arctic, which is actually «pristine» in general.

What simply amazes me (TonyB seems to agree) is that U.K. and other jurisdictions have enacted laws to mandate greenhouse gas reductions with HUGE impact on the taxpayers» lives without any evidence that they have even thought about the effectiveness of their programs in actually reducing global warming.

Although APS plans to reduce its coal burn from the current 35 % to 17 % by 2029, by increasing its natural gas burn from 19 % to 35 %, it will actually increase its greenhouse gas emissions in the near term, since the global warming potential from methane, which is leaked at multiple points of the natural gas supply chain, is 86 times that of carbon over 20 years, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's 2013 report.

Actually I added that but they did say global warming will continue as Europe cools down because of reduced sun spots.

«I know there are some out there, probably a couple hundred people, who actually believe that the world is coming to an end and man - made global warming is going to cause it, so I just want to give them the assurance that if they're right and we are wrong, [proposed climate policies are] not going to reduce but it will increase CO2 emissions,» he said.

This would imply that feedback actually works to reduce the net effect of greenhouse warming, from a sensitivity of 1.2 to one something like 0.6 C per doubling.

The Most Ineffective and Expensive Way to Address Potential Global Warming The European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme is proving horrendously expensive and unpopular, but is actually doing little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

«The global warming religion runs so deep today that most politicians figure it's best enact some sort of green policy, regardless of whether or not that policy actually reduces global warming.

Warming will also reduce the amount of time farmers can actually work their fields in areas where, for instance, air - conditioned tractor cabs are not available.

The link between adverse impacts such as more wildfires, ecosystem changes, extreme weather events etc. and their mitigation by reducing greenhouse gas emissions hinges on detecting unusual events for at least the past century and then actually attributing them to human caused warming.

This is true both in raw and adjusted temperature records, as adjustments have little impact in recent years and actually reduce long - term global warming.

Modifying land use, will more dramatically reduce CO2 concentrations than any warm and fuzzy carbon Ponzie scheme and might actually solve other issues in the process.

In regards to the first question, J. Stroeve (personal communication) notes that in the present warmer climate state, the tendency for a negative AO winter pattern to promote increased transport of ice into the western Beaufort / Chukchi seas — a pattern that historically has helped to reduce summer ice loss — actually enhances summer ice loss.

2) An important feedback (water vapor) that was always assumed to be positive (amplifying warming from CO2), actually is negative — reducing warming from CO2.

Scientists at ETH Zurich and the California Institute of Technology have shown that global warming actually tends to reduce temperature variability.

geez sunshine you do nt seem to realize that reducing the warming since 1945 actually reinforces the IPCC attribution statement... if there's less warming then CO2 caused a higher % of it.

The combined effect of all these changes is actually to reduce the rate of surface warming over the past 100 years compared to what we see in the raw temperature data.

Scientists Scratching Heads Why Oceans Actually Cooling Main Atmosphere «Infrared - Iris» Discovered: Automatically Reduces Global Warming - Global Climate's Powerful Negative Feedback»

Despite concerns over global warming, scientists have discovered something that may have actually limited the impact of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere in recent years by reducing the amount of sunlight reaching the surface of the Earth.

But now researchers are reporting that the incidence of the disease could actually be reduced with warming climate change.

(In fact, the Leaf Area Index on the edges of the Sahara is UP in many areas, indicating that — counter-intuitively — warmer climate has actually increased plant growth around the Sahara, not reduced it.)

While the impact of adjustments that correct for these biases are relatively small globally (and actually reduce the century - scale warming trend once oceans are included) there are certain regions where the impact of adjustments on temperature trends are large.

This assumption of 1C warming for a doubling of Co2 is relatively stable across both scientists and time, except that the IPCC actually reduced this number a bit between their 3rd and 4th reports.

And I think you hit the nail on the head with: «5) Once we scientifically - oriented Skeptics accept the reality of the Atmospheric «greenhouse effect» we are, IMHO, better positioned to question the much larger issues which are: a) HOW MUCH does CO2 contribute to that effect, b) HOW MUCH does human burning of fossil fuels and land use changes that reduce albedo affect warming, and, perhaps most important, c) Does the resultant enhanced CO2 level and higher mean temperature actually have a net benefit for humankind?»