Sentences with phrase «actually right and wrong»

A pre-employment personality assessment serves as a tool to help find the person who fulfills the criteria of a specific position; clearly, then, that there are actually right and wrong answers associated to specific positions.
In certain cases, there is actually a right and a wrong way to do something, especially when it comes to ensuring our children's health and safety.
You have no clue on what is actually right and wrong in terms of marriage.

Not exact matches

GREENBLATT: Right, well the idea really was is that when you give a gate, every September or October, people have to decide whether they want to lock up for another year or two, when you have monthly liquidity, you're never forcing them to make a decision maybe the wrong time, they can always have their money and it's not a signaling device to say you should have a short time horizon, actually for what we do, you need a long time horizon.
Gruber is both right and wrong: yes, Gundotra's rhetoric was stridently anti-Apple, but at the end of that keynote everyone in attendance received an HTC EVO 4G; when it came to the zero - sum game of actually putting phones in people's pockets, Apple's competitors (then) were companies like HTC, Motorola, and especially Samsung.
I feel like the invisible guy in the middle, somewhere between the ex-fundie charismatics who think it is wrong to be critical of anybody and the Todd / Benny / Joyce bashers, thinking what are the odds that one of these is actually 100 % right.
Only one will right those wrongs and actually save the unborn children.
Yet you, someone who has probably read a few Wikipedia pages and thrown in a few things you've heard throughout his life into his opinion is right and everyone that actually studies biology is wrong?
So then, The statement of «sin no more», is actually quite appropriate to the criminally - minded that still blur right from wrong, and literally pursue victims.
What makes me so sure that I'm right and everyone else wrong is actually nothing, because I do not have any proof, which is why there is such a big deal for a believer to emphasize the concepts of belief and faith.
So far Rush has been wrong about everything from womans reproductive rights, endangered species, climate change, how laws and bills are actually passed in congress, drugs, alcohol, gay marriage, marriage (what is he on now his 5th?)
to each is own, I actually read it too and think the opposite, one of us is wrong but that what makes life exciting right?
Actually, claims is the right word, and the bible has actually been proven wrong scientifically many timActually, claims is the right word, and the bible has actually been proven wrong scientifically many timactually been proven wrong scientifically many times over.
t cotton i actually think you are right because our motivation is wrong generally it is to meet our own needs or wants like a parent he gives us what will help us mature spiritually that frustrates us.God is loving and caring and knows what is best for us a lot of our disapointment comes from a wrong image of who God is.brentnz
One of the weirdest mysteries of life is the fact that children actually ARE born with an innate knowledge of God / afterlife / right and wrong / etc.
Bonhoeffer refers to this as well when he says that these «right / wrong» rules we live by actually separate us from god and define our fallen state.
You're actually wrong on the whole «I have a better chance of believing in something rather than nothing», you actually have the same amount of chance at being right as I do, plus riddle me this, if your god values good deeds and good actions, then do I not have an equal opportunity of getting into heaven.
Instead we are taken on a gentle tour of three arguments put forward for atheism:» [T] hat conflicts fought in the name of religion are always about religion; that it is ultimately possible to know with confidence what is right and what is wrong without acknowledging the existence of God; and that atheist states are not actually atheist.»
But, you are right that the majority reason for most is the Bible, and I see absolutely nothing wrong and everything right with actually having a moral code that you can point to for society.
What worries me most, is that what we've been taught as right, will actually turn out to be wrong, and what we always thought of as wrong, will turn out to be right.
You try and convince others they are wrong while never actually confirming you are right.
Actually, you are partially right and partially wrong.
We don't get our morals from a book of fiction... we get them from common sense... we actually use our brains and not buybull to tell us what is right and wrong (we all know that the buybull is 90 % wrong and thus we choose to think for ourselves).
Avoiding commitment as to any specific attitude which the church and Christian men ought to adopt toward war when war comes, the conference report contented itself with exhibiting the various views which Christians actually hold on that subject and with saying that while the church could neither affirm that any one of these was right and the others wrong nor acquiesce in the permanent continuance of these differences, it should promote the study of the problem with a view to a better understanding of the purpose of God.
1) In order to get value out of the bible, as you describe, we need an * independent * sense of right and wrong — those other long - established theologies included — something to teach us what to be inspired by and what to be appalled by and show us what direction that «moving forward» is actually going in.
While the debates rage on about whether Noah is biblical enough, Heaven is For Real true enough, and God is Not Dead profitable enough, Philomena delivers a quiet, understated, and powerful portrayal of the actual human experience, where clear - cut lines between good and evil, heroes and villains, right and wrong might be good «story-wise» but don't reflect the reality most people of faith actually live in.
Some people are actually right about something and that means those who don't agree are actually wrong.
«I think when you are looking and trying to compare drivers, within one team during a test session, while you don't actually know yourself the programme that the engineers are running and if you don't take into account the weather conditions right there and then when they are doing their [fastest] lap, I think it's very difficult to sit there and to say: «Have Williams potentially made the wrong decision because the reserve driver has set the fastest lap?»
If your every instinct is saying turn him heel and those instincts are wrong, maybe keeping him face is actually the right move.
this window has just finished i am already thinking about who we will get for the january window we might try for khedira on a really low offer as he is free agent almost would help boost numbers in midfield in the new year as we will no doubt need to filling the numbers about then also i will hold my hands up and say i was wrong this morning for giving wenger stick and saying welbeck is rubbish i have been out in the cold light of day and had a chance to reevaluate the situation and realized that this could be a canny shrew transfer on wenger behalf actually if wenger can turn the clock back and work his magic on welbeck and get him scoring goals and improve his game then we could have a great underrated signing on our hands its wengers absolute trust in him that might be what makes him a great player as this is something that he never had at old mordor if anybody can make him a world beater wenger can he loves this little pet projects improving players against the odds welbeck has the skillset to be high class player upfornt he just needs to work very hard on his finishing i think once he gets a few goals under his belt he will settle in fine and he is a team player you could put him on the left against man city to shore up that side and he will put in a great shift without a complaint that could be his biggest asset to us or on the right whenever we need him there ithinkwenger might start himon the left against city to protect the left back against navas and i bet you if he does a great job we will take a shine to him quickly i am hopeing he will be one of those wenger gems that he finds and polishes up to a high finish i must admit i was annoyed as some other gunners were at not signing d / m and c / h but if wenger does win the league with this lot it will be his greatest win yet and what might play in to our hands is the unpredictable nature of the league in the last few seasons if we get on a good run at the right time we might be hard to stop look at city they should have never lost to stoke but the result is there in black and white for all to see and i think chelsea will hit the skids after a while to just because cesc and costa are doing well now thats there main threat but teams will work out how to stop them as the season goes on and chelsea will become predictable i think we might just do well this season after all
I was wrong and you were right in that the only losses were people who mainly had nothing to actually say and contented themselves with «thumbs».
We do not know if this little nugget of an Arsenal transfer rumour is actually right, but after Arsene Wenger signed a central midfielder Mohamed Elneny in the January transfer window and with the three current Arsenal players in question being generally on the fringe of the first team and being on the wrong side of the maghic 30 - year old mark I would say there is definitely something in it.
We need a CB and striker to compete for top 3 not the league and its been the same for 4 years +, but Wenger who is tactically inept will keep trying to prove us wrong while actually proving us right year after year.
I'm not out here to prove you wrong, or prove myself right, and I actually AM tired of the entire talking about football.
i think you've hit the nail on the head with the injuries, rosicky especially, having finally taken the time to appreciate what was actually wrong with him, they've been able to put it right once and for all, we all saw how after sending van persie back to holland to really sort his problem out the season before last, it resulted in what we saw last year, our first season with a fully fit robin.
I've had that happen any number of times, I made a claim about something I «knew,» someone challenged me, I looked for a source to back up my point and discovered I was actually wrong, or at least much less right than I thought.
Would it really bring greater satisfaction if absolute certainty could be introduced or would it actually take away the great enjoyment that football fans obviously get from the argument and the discussion about the rights and wrongs of decisions on which individual games, cups and championships turn?
However, as a devoted follower of Ghanaian and African politics in general, it is important to tease out where Hon. Bagbin actually got it right, where he went wrong and the untold story of his life.
First contention, the Polls got it wrong: This is utter poppycock to say the least, the only thing the Poll got wrong was the wrong Government given only 24 % of all eligible voters actually voted for the Tories, that's right, 76 % hate the fuckers and still we have a Tory government — time to abandon support for First Past The Post me thinks.
I tried the diet before I was really ready to do it right and was actually on it 100 % but in the wrong stage for a month before I started it again this time.
I spent a lot of time trying to get everything «right» as a kid, but when I actually learned the most and got better was when I got it wrong.
I am a firm believer that if it can go wrong it probably will which all adds up to a pleasantly surprised attitude when things actually go right and a roll - up - the - sleeves - to - fix - it attitude when things go wrong.
Mind that a good quality HD powder always looks great in real life and you would never know if you applied it right or wrong for a flash photography until you actually take a photo.
It's actually a pretty funny memory because it was actually a horrible day (we had train tickets for the wrong weekend and didn't find this out until we somehow made it to the train station to find out we needed to go back — Paris for summer solstice is INSANE — the streets are packed and you can't go anywhere), but there is something just dreamy about Paris that makes everything ok, am I right?
The Perils of Cyber-Dating is a funny, entertaining account of all the Mr. Rights and Mr. Wrongs she actually went out with while casting her fishing net out into the murky waters of the internet dating scene.
The Evil Within 2 get so much right that it's predecessor got wrong, and it's actually a great game on top of that.
, can your xbox do that don't think so, how did it sell out of preorders everywhere in every store?and if it is well its just right for you because the way you said it was a «babies toy'implyes that your probably 6 - 10, and ummmmm your to late nintendo is releasing «wii mini» (actually do nt see the point i didn't really say it to be a good thing but whatever it still proofs you wrong) annnnd end rant!
Though Joey called her work nomination - worthy, I seriously doubt she'll — right or wrongactually get Oscar traction, but considering her acclaim the Golden Globe race for Best Actress in a Comedy / Musical could be a tight race between her and Kristen Wiig.
This year though I will actually put forward who I believe will win as opposed to my usual high horse nature of just putting what / who I want to know in hopes that the Academy read my blog and would realize that I'm right and they're wrong.
However, there were also students who were afraid of getting things wrong, and actually avoided challenges so they could get everything right all of the time.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z