Not exact matches
While the
incident highlights what many
see as Twitter's confusing direct messaging feature (and its hard - to - navigate user interface in general), it also serves as a warning for brands and,
actually, anyone who uses the platform: If Twitter's own CFO can mess up on Twitter, so can you.
Obviously, more video will need to emerge to
see the totality of what
actually happened in the
incident.
While the number of
incidents have increased state wide, Erie County has
actually seen a slight increase.
I can
see why we'd think B&N might want that, but haven't read
incidents of it
actually happening.
You get to
actually see how annual deductibles work vs. per -
incident deductibles.
No need, and yes, rather dumb * of me to forget the decay products (* or perhaps just evidence of lack of time on my part), although the broader point I made still stands, which is that some sources of radiation are otherwise chemically benign and others are not, though I admit much ignorance on the relative importance of chemical toxicity and wouldn't be surprised to find out it is generally quite small in such
incidents like Fukushima and Chernobyl — but I don't
actually know it; I thought perhaps it deserved clarification (and maybe — note that I'm not justifying this — that's why some people may
see radiation from a pollutant as worse than radiation from natural source?).
While this amendment clearly provides MOL Inspectors with the ability to review past workplace
incidents, how such powers of review will
actually be exercised remains to be
seen.