Sentences with phrase «actually saying anything to»

This story feels closest to what's happening in the world without actually saying anything to direct but rather playing in the real world.

Listen to her interview on Fox News last night, she looked ridiculous, clueless, and kept on spewing out the same political rhetoric without actually saying anything to an extent that I actually felt bad for her.

David (Paul Rudd) is still hopelessly in love with a woman who has long since outgrown any possible interest in him; Jay (Romany Malco) is a ladies» man who considers himself an irresistible seducer, and Cal (Seth Rogen) is the guy with practical guidance, such as «date drunks» and «never actually say anything to a woman; just ask questions.»

Sometimes you don't need to actually say anything to tell a powerful story.

It gives you something to put on social media (if you choose) so that you and your spouse can «tell» people about your divorce in a unified way, without having to actually say anything to anyone face to face.

Not that I'm brave enough to actually say anything to them in real life.

Not exact matches

He says the sweet spot for measurables is six to 10 metrics: anything less isn't rigorous enough; any more is probably wasting time better spent on actually, you know, innovating.

So there's nothing surprising at all to me about the fact that I never actually bought anything today — and yet nobody said a word about it.

Another way to do — to get out when there is that lull in the conversation, say, «Hey, I want to introduce you to someone, I think you'll have lot in common» and then take that person over there but make sure the person that you are dumping that person off actually would get something out of that conversation because that would just be rude — if there was anything there.

Peele, BuzzFeed, and Monkeypaw Productions used a controversial but widely available software to make the video, in an effort to demonstrate the dangers of «deepfakes,» aka digitally manipulated videos that have the power to «make it look like anyone is saying [or doing] anything at any point in time,» that didn't actually happen.

But on another level, no matter how many times Zuckerberg says he's responsible for this or that, it doesn't change the fact that he's not actually responsible to anyone for anything.

But America has become resistant to doing anything about this issue, in large part due to a decades - long public campaign by the National Rifle Association (NRA) to convince the US public and politicians that, in fact, the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms and that more guns will actually make people safer, contrary to what the research says.

Way, way too many business blogs seem terrified that they might actually strike up a conversation and never say anything that incites a reaction from readers — and if somebody does comment, there's nobody around to keep the conversation going.

Republicans including House Speaker Paul Ryan and many in the Senate have said a regulatory fix on bump stocks would be faster than passing the bill, but the rulemaking process to examine the regulation will take a year, with no guarantee that the ATF will actually do anything.

We could say that the rest is history, but we would still have to wait a thousand years or more before anything can be said to be actually historically accurate.

Actually Jesus you're wrong about what Atheism said, prayer changes things by not doing anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course of events to transpire.

You still couldn't actually defend anything you say, and continue to revert to irrelevant idiocy.

Who actually says that unbelievers have to decide anything??? I am a believer, and I congratulate CNN for it's most interesting blog!

They were actually interested in conversation and trying to be honest, whereas Chad loves to twist anything said and not answer a single thing.

How actually says that unbelievers have to decide anything??? I am a believer and I congratulate CNN for its most interestring blog!

I agree, though I will say their are christians who actually do help the poor and sick - real christians that no one every hears about mainly because real christians, unlike Camping, don't seek praise or attention and don't do things to gain anything.

«By refusing to sign marriage certificates, Jones «penalizes heterosexual couples who are coming to the church without actually winning anything for same - sex couples,» [Stephanie] Coontz says.»

Given that Artie didn't actually say anything, merely quoted a section of The Babble, perhaps he's trying to show what an azzhole the alleged but never proven god of The Babble is.

I am sorry that in the past, I condemned you and your writings as «heresy» without ever actually reading or listening to anything you wrote or said, or trying to understand your views.

Romney is actually more liberal at heart, but is more willing to say and do anything to get elected.

Whether it is the seemingly innocuous statement about oneself to a colleague, or an outright negative comment about a sermon heard, or perhaps it is «harmlessly» talking about a housemate or spouse while chatting with friends, even if not actually saying anything, you know, that would cross the line into «gossip.»

Because it can also be true that there's a need and no one else is doing [anything], but I don't actually have anything I can honestly bring to the table,» Haugen says.

Having said that, priests / ministers in the Roman and Anglo - catholic traditions have said the same to me about not falling into the trap of letting themselves believe they actually have the authority to do anything except influence or guide.

in other words, using lots of fancy words and terms to hide the fact that you haven't actually debunked nor even challenged anything the author said.

So all you have is more empty platitudes, assertions, and reiterations rather than actually demonstrating anything you say is even likely to be true.

What Mark S. and others are clearly pointing out that these church people can say anything at Citizens of the US and if they want to speak in an official capacity for the church, that's fine too, but they should in no way be invited to the planning table with the joint chiefs the same way that PETA can stomp their feet all they want to but aren't actually involved with congress on how to tax meat products.

It is not necessary to believe anything they have said about what eternal life will actually be like.

if any of these things going on in my life actually help take me somewhere and help me to become a self supporting, productive person, I guess I'd have to say it was more luck and sheer will power more than anything?

The only thing harder to understand than your comment is understanding how it has anything to do with what Sabio actually said.

When you say something to slander someone that obviously has no validity or merit (like Obama believes in nothing) and it really is just an emotional outburst, it actually demonstrates that you just don't have anything negative to say... and then it actually is a compliment.

In a day with no papers, no writing for almost everyone, no recording devices of any kind, it's simply not reasonable to think that 30 — 100 years later anyone coud actually remember anything he said.

We want to have these conversations, but don't bring in a speaker, hear what they say, and then not actually do anything.

Amen.The thing is too many people from both sides try to disprove the other, Scientist (well some) will say there is no God Ala Hawkings here and then some believers will say that evolution or anything pertaining to science that they don't understand is false.I don't believe that science and God are mutually exclusive.For me personally science helps to explain a lot of things regarding creation, almost like giving me a window into how creative God is.I believe that God uses science to show us how awesome he is.To me science does not disprove Gods existence it actually reaffirms it on a human logic level, for me.You may disagree, that's fine, but this is just how I see it.

I paraphrase, of course, but the statement was anything but a firm defense of the pope, never mind an effort to explain what he actually said.

You really think a WOLOLOLOLO on CNN is going to actually turn someone who has been told from birth «Lack of proof is proof» to anything you say?

Actually, the real problem with empiricism is it is does not tell me anything I Really need to know since it can say nothing to «final» or «efficient» causes (it may or may not claim to do so).

what's crazy is you saying that you believe that it is actually possible to criticize something that you do nt know anything about.

Many of the «New Atheism» breed are going to criticize for anything and everything, it simply does nt matter if there is any data to actually back up what they are saying, or any rationality to what they say.

I'm not trying to say there is anything wrong with vegetarianism or veganism at all - just that apparently nootch isn't a valid form of B vitamins, but of B analogs that can actually block the absorption of actual B vitamins.

Arsene Wenger has given 3,000 interviews since he came to Arsenal but he has yet to actually say anything.

I've really gone cold on us getting Khedira, but at the moment he seems the most likely DM to join — there hasn't been anyone else that has been linked heavily enough that Wenger has actually said anything about them.

Social media users have certainly taken this move by Vardy as a sign that he will reject the transfer to Arsenal, although at least he has not actually said anything.

that's what is hilarious, he literally spits on our faces and says» you don't know anything i have managed over 1000 amount of games» but can't even beat middle team club like stoke in 8 attempts or beat mouth - rinho in 13 attempts, he think's he's amazing but he is actually embarrassing, he is getting us thrashed REGULARLY, the only team that hasn't completely embarrassed us are the spuds, I actually can't understand how fans didn't riot when arsene went to rome for charity matches when we needed him the most, I'm not even angry at him anymore, how can a man so proud let moroninho call him a «specialist in failure» and just prove him right time and time again, not only will it benefit arsenal for arsene to leave but it will also help the man himself, do the right thing and take a walk mate

you said the same thing after this event in 2014... and again in 2015... then last year we did nt actually win anything but we added xhaka so lets get behind the team like wat a «true» fan does... unlike others on this site who do nt really know anything about footie like me even though ive been wrong about our chances for the last 10 seasons it do nt matter coz i'm a real fan and wenger is a great bloke who knows about footie whereas all these negative fans do nt know nuffin... its like listening to some demented uncle every xmas droning on about how things were better in the old days when everyone knew their place....

I get what you are saying but I just do nt see any coach who has actually watched Giroud note I said who's actually watched Giroud to pay above 20mill for him.Trust me when the time comes for him to go we ai nt gonna get a lot of cash.i also expect him to be going to a lesser team and not a top team.Trust me he's really lucky to be an Arsenal player as some of our playrrs here are.I don't want to mention names because my blood boils up when I even think of them in the team.There are so many players in this team I don't rate but hey I guess I got ta keep em to myself.Sadly Giroud is one of them.It's not like I hate or I refuse to see the light but it's just that my eyes are telling me he's average when I watch him.So if anything please blame my eyes.