Not exact matches
But most
secular journalists have a tenuous grasp of what religious
people actually believe.
The point modernist rationalism has to establish, or assume, is that a common
secular rationality exists which is capable in principle of resolving the issues that
actually divide
people.
Atheists are minority in the U.S. and the world no matter what «
secular» sources and polls voted by few thousands of
people tells you that were made up by silly atheists dreaming about making America more atheist, unbiblical and unGodly than what it
actually is.
We
actually started as a
secular nation, we went along for a little, had a civil war which killed a bunch of
people, went merrily along for a few more years, got mired in 2 more world wars, then inserted GOD int he 1950's into the pledge and on the money to protect ourselves from communists (because that somehow protects us from communists) and then we've been going along ever since.
It weakens, he argues, only those religions that are minimally differentiated from the
secular culture, but it
actually facilitates the gathering of critical masses of
people with distinctive religious views who are motivated to create and maintain strong group ties.
Yeah, right... he «unintentionally hurt»
people... he accidentally said parents should hit their kids if they THINK they might be gay... sure, it was a typo... he couldn't
actually have MEANT it... and it was
secular liberal media's fault... because all real «fair - minded»
people know what he meant... and that he didn't mean it... and someone else was to blame if he did... not that he did... but still he was the REAL victim...
Actually, it was the leaders of the 19th century Indian Renaissance and the political thinkers in the ideological leadership of the 20th centary Indian Nationalism who grappled with the
person and teachings of Jesus Christ and assimilated the essence of Christian humanism into the religious and
secular thought of modern India.
Similarly, they did not merely say there should be separation of church and state; rather, they
actually separated them by (1) establishing a
secular government on the power of «We the
people» (not a deity), (2) saying nothing to connect that government to god (s) or religion, (3) saying nothing to give that government power over matters of god (s) or religion, and (4), indeed, saying nothing substantive about god (s) or religion at all except in a provision precluding any religious test for public office.
«When you're on a site like Match.com or other
secular ones you have to troll through all of these other profiles to figure out, «Is the
person I'm interested in
actually a true believer.»»