Sentences with phrase «actually see errors»

It is a very good idea to ask another person to do the proofreading and editing for you, because over the course of writing the paper you get so used to it, that you can't actually see errors right away.

You can actually see this error at work in all of DC's preview comics, because the price and issue number are incorrect.

Not exact matches

I've actually read the Bible, in its entirety, and I've seen just how many errors it contains.

Thank you for the question, fore through this dialog I have seen the errors of my ways thinking I actually knew the answer.

However, if the NFL won't allow those plays to be reviewed, then they should error on the side of actually having seen the offense rather than relying on if it just appeared to be helmet - to - helmet.

Of all the things Wenger gets slated for, I just can't see him doing nothing this time around when he himself is trying to correct the error from the summer (DM, CB, ST)... We could actually go from the position we're at now to a 1st place team in 1 window with the right purchases...

At Pressbooks, we actually validate all the EPUBs as they go through our system, so if you sometimes see one of those messages that say there was an error with your book, it's usually because something's not valid in your EPUB.

Not only is a good proofreader amazingly good at actually seeing what you've actually written (as opposed to what you THINK you've written — missing words that our minds fill in, homonyms, etc.) but they will see where the design has created problems that weren't in the manuscript — technical fine points like rivers, widows and orphans, as well as gross formatting errors — missing paragraphs, improperly formatted pages and the like.

I haven't seen any real attacks on their methodology (other than the corrections that have been made), just «look, they made a 50 % error (actually 43 %), and other peoples» results fit our theory better, so don't pay attention to S&C anymore.»

I see first - hand in my field of research many non-intentional mistakes and errors being made and how science actually progresses by the ensuing debate.

See, the first thing to do is do determine what the temperature trend during the recent thermometer period (1850 — 2011) actually is, and what patterns or trends represent «data» in those trends (what the earth's temperature / climate really was during this period), and what represents random «noise» (day - to - day, year - to - random changes in the «weather» that do NOT represent «climate change»), and what represents experimental error in the plots (UHI increases in the temperatures, thermometer loss and loss of USSR data, «metadata» «M» (minus) records getting skipped that inflate winter temperatures, differences in sea records from different measuring techniques, sea records vice land records, extrapolated land records over hundreds of km, surface temperature errors from lousy stations and lousy maintenance of surface records and stations, false and malicious time - of - observation bias changes in the information.)

Now I am not a great fan of the aggregated tide gauge record seeing as it relies on so few gauges (as cited) most with short histories (as cited) or have moved (as cited) or have been interpolated (as cited) To globally aggregate such low grade information only compounds the errors However, anyone working on flood defence work would use a tide gauge as it provides a more accurate record of the place where the sea actually hits the land, where people live, as opposed to satellites which measure open sea.

Periodically looking at your driving record can also help give you an idea of your record's status, and help you to see if any errors exist; after all, nobody wants to get turned down for a job or lose a court case because too many points you never actually earned are showing on your license.

Even if the process appears to have failed, click on the house «Home» icon in your Plex Media Server to go back to the main screen and then open up the HelloHue channel again — the majority of the time, the error you see is meaningless and the plugin is actually loaded fine.

While this test wasn't as comprehensive as our previous tests (for example see Comparison of 176 Registry Cleaner Products), this time the test focused entirely on the effects of actually cleaning the system registry and not simply comparing the number of errors that different products find.

Plus, even if you're the most qualified candidate, if your resume has a single error in terms of formatting or content, it's likely going to get automatically tossed out by automated filtering systems (or ATS) before a real person can actually see it.