Sentences with phrase «actually see the object»

Not exact matches

In this second case we are actually dealing with images: objects that can be seen and that always involve a visible representation.

Similarly, when we look into the depths of the clear sky, what we actually see is an unspecifiable total ground of movement, from which objects emerge.

What actually happens is that the eye reads the light as standard and sees how the object affects that light: it reads the relation between the light coming in and coming off, and reads the other colours in relation to a chosen colour and in relation to its own adaptive state.

Anyways, sometimes I feel like he is actually a human child in disguise because he literally keeps us up all night with his shenanigans and we have to take shifts getting out of bed in the middle of the night to see what thing he has just knocked over, or what loud object he is racing across the floor.

Allowing children to observe this very natural, very normal act might actually help them not to see breasts (and women) as sexual objects.

They do have a pretty nifty feature called «blind spot monitoring system» that detects objects in your blind spots with a cue light in the mirrors (and a chime if you have the signal light on towards that blind spot) but depending on that, or any system in lieu of actually being able to see if you are clear seems dubious to me.

Elana — first — you are doing a good job second — at 9 months your bubba is learning about object permanence — if he fusses when you leave the room — he is developmentally right on track don't worry — it doesn't last — and is actually a good sign — it signals that he is well attached to you — which is highly desirable in terms of raising happy well adjusted children that are willing to explore their world He isn't to young for independent play — It just might be for a little while that it happens while he can see you As he chooses to — allow him to move himself out of your sight (somewhere safe of course) i.e around the edge of a couch, through a door way etc — playing disappearing and reappearing games like peek - a-boo and hiding things under boxes / blankets for him to «find» etc is good too as time goes on — he will learn that things re-appear when they disappear

If an object is massive enough, it can actually create detectable gravitational waves, or ripples in space - time, which scientists saw for the first time earlier this year.

This ability to examine black holes and other influential dark objects without actually «seeing» them with light has scientists excited about the gravitational wave era.

Our brain is so good at identifying contours and objects in images that it is sometimes deceived into seeing them even if they do not actually exist (such as the edges of the blue triangle in the foreground of the figure).

With this discovery, remarkably, we are starting to actually see such objects for the first time.»

That star is Alpha Centauri, which is actually not one but three stars whose combined light seems to form a single object as seen from Earth.

Prior to the study, scientists had observed synchronous patterns of electrical activity between the two circuit hubs after a monkey saw an object, but weren't sure if the signals actually represent such short - term visual memories in the brain.

The answer actually applies to many subjects studied in physics and deep - space astronomy — when you can't observe something directly, or you can't explain something you are seeing, you make educated guesses based on what you do see: the effect on other objects.

Eventually, the pair saw that if they ran simulations using a hypothetical massive planet in what's called an anti-aligned orbit — a path in which the planet's perihelion, or closest approach to the sun, is 180 degrees from all of the other objects and known planets in the solar system — their six strangely behaving objects moved in the strange alignment that they actually do in reality.

It's very clear that money is no object for some of the bloggers I read, and while I love to see their picks, I like that I can actually afford to buy the pieces you showcase.

The rest of the cast includes a large gathering of well - known folks whom, like the beast, we never actually see until the very end, since they mostly provide the voices of the anthropomorphized inanimate objects in the beast's castle.

Recurring gags abound, like musician Clarence Clemmons following the lead characters around while playing his sax, or Lola getting objects stuck to the bottom of her high - heeled shoes; jokes that are funnier to think about than to actually see.

And so over time you actually establish this continuity, the boundaries become permeable, in that there's not so much discontinuity that you're experiencing, you're beginning to see what boundary objects you can use to move across the different subject areas.

First of all there were a lot of individual effects on the children from introducing this type of playground: children were seen to be a lot more excited going out to play; they would enter their classrooms after lunchtime and would still be talking about what they did during that play; they were a lot more engaged, they were using the space a lot more readily, so, taking these materials out - and that could be one influence on how physical activity actually increased; they were solving problems and using their creativity skills - which I can also talk about how the children use all these objects to be creative in the school playground.

There were a range of social effects as well: children were seen to be negotiating items with other children, which is quite a higher order thinking skill; they were modelling behaviour on others, so they could actually see how children were playing with some of the equipment and then being able to join in (so it was a lot more inclusive, they were able to see how some of the children used some of the equipment); and they were really working together, using teamwork skills and creating these different objects and structures and stations to play around in the school playground.

Other things included missing elevator doors, guards seeing through objects or just shooting at a wall, or refusing to open a door to actually chase me if I closed it.

The thing is the casual xbots who are actually interested in pointless BS like adds spam and shiny objects with there ignorance and untrained eyes won't see the difference.

The trouble I did have, however, was at one point I couldn't actually see the highlight on one particular object, so even with this tool I struggled to progress — and I think the small screen was mostly to blame for this issue.

Presumably the other sides of various objects and backdrops weren't actually textured or properly modelled in game and flight let you see how disjointed the levels are.

In the end, the only fun I actually had when playing the sandbox mode (and the entire game, for that matter), was when I completely ignored the objectives and NPCs asking for help and just started creating objects, adding as many adjectives as possible just so I could see the game struggling to make them come to fruition.

The ambiguity of reflections of air on water, and objects in and on water makes it impossible to be sure of what you are actually seeing and what Monet was exactly painting.

It is immense, but even when seen from a distance it brings the viewer very close to objects that are actually small: the jagged blue - green leaves of nettles, yellow - green grasses.

It's a common misconception that the Great Wall of China can be seen from space, but there is another manmade object close by that is visible from 438 miles up — a soupy mass of smog hovering over Beijing so thickly opaque that it can actually obscure a large swath of the city from sight.

We see this often in the climate debate: many figures, from Cook and his 97 %, through to John Gummer restyled as Lord Deben, pronouncing on «deniers» and what they deny, without ever actually taking any notice of what was being «denied» — the consensus without an object.

Thus in summary, lets see what evidence you have suggesting that cooler photons are actually absorbed by a warmer object.

«The result is a system that sees what you see, allowing lightfield objects to not only exist in the physical world but actually interact with it,» the company said.