In this case, B&N has implemented comment sharing: «Not only can you lend a whole title, you can
actually share a quote of text with others, that in itself is unique to B&N,» said Horner.
Not exact matches
A friend
shared the Rilke
quote with me earlier in the week and I realized today that I'm
actually enjoying the questions.
But instead of dealing with the issue our friend sets of on a path of misdirection raising tales of Sir Henry, who
actually did nothing that was not going on at every other club to some degree and which all, other than the toffs, would support; well maybe not the bus but at least he was not parking it;
quoting wrongdoings when far more embarrassing incidents happened at his own club and confusing himself with the commercial practices of issuing, buying and selling and trading
shares.
So instead of
sharing the whole videos themselves or articles themselves,
share some of the sources cited and
actually read through the primary source and
quote from it.
Is anyone
actually 100 % clear whether Amazon is «offering» (scare
quotes, because a leaked letter floating an idea to only a few authors isn't an actual offer) to give $ 9.99 for every e-book sold straight to the authors, or just offering to give Amazon's
share of $ 9.99 as long as Hachette agrees to hand over their
share?
Someone pointed out to me that the
quote was
actually from an indie author, and that days earlier she'd complained that everyone was taking her
quote and
sharing it without attribution — exactly like I'd done.
You would either have to call or go online to a bunch of different company's websites, enter you information, and get a call back for a
quote (heaven forbid they
actually share their rates online).
-- Since end - April, the TAM
share price has
actually been
quoted / traded in excess of both the original & final offer prices.