Sentences with phrase «actually spent the money on»

I can't believe someone actually spent the money on something like this, and that they got it done so quickly.

I can't believe someone actually spent the money on something like this, and that they got it done...

Arsene need to choose between out talented the opposition, by actually spend the money on top notch players or just go with the natural flow of football tactics and implement a more organized creativity in his side.

The New York Yankees wrongly took millions of dollars in rent credits from the city for costs supposedly connected to planning the team's new stadium, when they actually spent the money on normal team operations, I reported in 2007.

I wouldn't include c / o items in the budget since you're not actually spending money on them.

You also want to make sure your coats are something you are actually spending money on.

The last book I actually spent money on (never again, I've learned my lesson) was called «Some Writers Deserve To Starve» and the author had one novel published by Publish America» and her only other title is another advice book.

Anyway, the best part about this new «regular salary» thing is it allowed me to actually spend money on my self publishing ventures.

So, wouldn't it be nice if you could earn (and redeem) rewards on the things you actually spend your money on?

So, wouldn't it be nice if you could earn (and redeem) rewards on the things you actually spend your money on?

But few people report actually spending money on travel.

As a gamer, I can't imagine why anyone would want to drive out the people who actually spend money on the games we enjoy.

Nintendo actually spent money on acquiring the rights to these movies in order to ensure that they are never seen again.

Remember that before you actually spend money on repair or replacement items and let them know right away so you don't end up filing any unnecessary Harambee renters insurance claims if you can help it.

I don't want to judge anyone for how they choose to spend their precious free time on this planet — I actually spent money on PC Building Simulator.

Not exact matches

But that wasn't our master plan and we've had to spend a lot of money on PR so people knew it actually worked.

There's a big difference between paying people to participate in a focus group and having them actually think they're about to spend money on something.

He urges the couple to spend not just on worthy causes, but to actually invest a substantial chunk of their money in fundraising, an activity that has been looked down on as potentially wasteful in the past.

A whisky enthusiast who spent # 7,623 on a single measure of scotch, thinking it was extremely rare, actually wasted his money on a fake.

Before spending money on business incubators, Congress should first figure out whether we really need more in the U.S. and whether they actually help create jobs.

Money can actually buy happiness according to this social science researcher — the key is not spending it on yourself.

Americans spend a ton of money on diet and exercise — health clubs alone take in over $ 75 billion a year in revenue — in spite of the fact that most of us have no clue as to which nutrition and exercise plans are actually best for us.

He would come to spend a couple of hours with us, giving us current examples that we could actually act on ourselves if we had any money.

With a cleaner economy we would actually have much more government money to spend on healthcare.

By automatically transferring a percentage of your paycheck into savings before you can get your hands on it, 401ks and other workplace plans increase the odds that the money will actually be saved rather than spent.

To not have to worry about money anymore and spend our lives on the things that actually matter and are important to us?

For example, income per capita actually rises as crime rises if the country spends more money to fight that rising crime — on a larger police force or improved intelligence technologies.

You would actually have more time (and hard - earned money) to spend on the things you truly love.

You can also try to contact leading media players and recommend your book or actually send them a copy, you can spend some small amounts of money in advertising your book on a limited number of websites, you can do direct mail advertising by contacting thousands of US bookstores and so on.

That right there will make churches think twice about spending their money on a new building they may not actually need.

Instead of spending time and money on tattoos, how about actually doing something to help people less fortunate than you?

I am not sure that churches can spend their money this way, since when a church spends money on «life» they are spending it on «church life» which is actually discipleship.

I mean, really, all those monies you spent on Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic lessons really don't mean that much if you don't actually act on my clear cut commandments...

The San Francisco study actually found that 94 percent of panhandlers spend whatever money they get on food, compared to just 44 percent who spend it on drugs or alcohol.

If you take everything you spend on eating out, going to movies, taking trips, and «enjoying life» and it comes to more than 10 % of your annual income, you might actually want to cut back on the amount of money you are «tithing» to your family, and spend more on loving and serving others, helping the poor, taking care of orphans and widows, and showing others the love of Jesus.

I agree with not supporting horrible practices of animal agriculture, and you can actually help the fight against animal cruelty by spending your money on well sourced meat by local farmers who treat their animals right.

Members will not receive points on any coupon or promotional offer; points will only be issued for the amount of money actually spent during the visit.

Another thing I got to thinking about was the fact that bloggers DO actually spend a lot of money on the materials for their blogs.

I would much like us to spend money on a player that will actually feature for most of the season not someone who'll link up with Diaby in the medic room, Hummels is a great player but his recent injury record is definitely not what we need.

Should that money be better spent on paying players that may actually be able to play once in a while?

And if you think about it, the triumph of the underdogs Leicester City has actually proved the Frenchman right, because for years he has been saying that it is not all about spending money on big name transfers.

In fact I think that the fans would not he half as angry now if the team was doing the same but the boss had actually spent some decent money on transfers in the summer and winter transfer window.

But the money we do spend is often poorly targeted Wellbeck Gabriel Debuchy Chambers a total of 60 mill to players who contribute minimally and all bought to save money but their failure actually means we are forced to spend 30 mil on Mustafi and 17 mill on Perez meaning we continue to spend good money after bad.

The difference here between tax cuts and actually smart government spending (spending on infrstructure which creates jobs) is that it puts money in the hands of people that actually spend.

(3) this team is rotting from the inside out and it's going to take some unprecedented moves on the part of this board and the fans to facilitate the necessary changes... this club must rid itself of it's absentee billionaire landlord before we become just another sporting wasteland in this man's collection of flailing clubs... when this is done it will expose just what exactly has been going on behind the scenes and I'm afraid of what will be uncovered because if Wenger's business model is as antiquated as his football philosophy it could look an awful lot like and old Monty Python sketch in the backroom... we need to replace the owner with someone who actually cares about this club and isn't afraid to wear their emotions on his or her sleeves or spend their own money to achieve greatness... this new owner needs to find someone who represents the same sort of cutting edge that Wenger represented in his early years then pair that individual with someone who knows how to conduct transfers in the modern era... then and only then will we find a way to escape the malaise that has permeated our once storied club for way too many years

I do not actually expect arsenal to spend any large money on the CB position, he could have already got some cheap experience buy already, so i figure it will be the same 4 battling for the CB position (Mert, Gab, CHAmbers, Kos).

He's a good player I guess but the amount of money it would cost to brig him here would be extortionate and would be far better spent on other players that would actually improve our best 11.

This raised a few eyebrows in the football media, despite the fact that the club did actually spend a decent amount of money on a few new players in the summer transfer window.

Compared to those, we would be spending our money on someone who will actually improve the team, rather than just an addition to the squad.

Virgil van Dijk Perhaps the most obvious choice; given Liverpool's affinity with buying Southampton players as of late; but Virgil van Dijk may well be the one key Southampton player Liverpool actually spend money wisely on.