Sentences with phrase «actually taking their cases to court»

While most accident victims want to get the maximum amount of compensation for their injuries, many have concerns about actually taking their cases to court.

Not exact matches

A legal eagle who's argued 20 cases in front of the U.S. Supreme Court, Underwood appears to be that behind - the - scenes person in the office who actually runs the office while her boss takes a public victory lap.

That case that we've taken in central Australia is actually the first time that a book up proceedings has been taken to court under the responsible lending provisions.

Have you actually seen cases where creditors have taken people to court and sue them?

A motion is a request you make to the court asking it to take some kind of action other than actually deciding the issues in your case.

But the 18 month ceiling for a provincial court case is actually a longer period of time than was typically acceptable under the previous guidelines — leaving defence lawyers concerned that their clients will take longer to reach trial.

More people are trying to represent themselves in court but they lack the experience and technical knowledge of lawyers... Judges are in a difficult position because they want to try and speed cases up but actually have to take more time with people representing themselves.»

If the government starts winning cases on the basis that its policies are actually in keeping with at least a reasonable take on the best expertise that exists in the realm of prison administration, rather than simply because courts reflexively defer to the administrators, Ms. Kerr will have succeeded, and we all will be better off.

The likelihood of reoffending may indeed be taken into account by the court or competent authority, but in order to assess, in addition to, or weighed against, the other conditions or criteria laid down by that directive and the case ‑ law of the Court, whether it is actually necessary to order expulcourt or competent authority, but in order to assess, in addition to, or weighed against, the other conditions or criteria laid down by that directive and the case ‑ law of the Court, whether it is actually necessary to order expulCourt, whether it is actually necessary to order expulsion.

Holding the Government of Canada to Account on Environmental Enforcement, few cases have been taken to court, and the penalties actually imposed have typically been low:

Judicial responses to alienation include: ordering an assessment; ordering supervised access on a permanent basis; intervention in the early stages of the dispute, before the problem has had time to become «true» alienation, or in the early years of a child's development; changing custody on a temporary basis; determining whether «pure» or «mixed» alienation is taking place; keeping the courts involved; suggesting counselling; making a finding of contempt; making a no - contact order; involving the Children's Aid Society; not making a parallel parenting order; meeting with the children; and in extreme cases, putting the alienating parent's actions on court record, in hopes that if the child revisits the issue as an adult, they may be able to see what actually took place.

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.