Sentences with phrase «actually talk to their humans»

In a new study scientists have finally verified what pet owners have known for years, that dogs can actually talk to their humans.

Sometimes you'll need to actually talk to a human.

Not exact matches

His worry is actually about human testing in the field, but, he says, he's already talking to WHO about how those studies would be done.

«If you talk to people who've campaigned around the world for human rights and religious rights, they would say that where we are starting is actually on a path that could lead to the same sort of regimes that are elsewhere in the world, certainly in terms of persecution of Christians,» he said.

People living to near a 1000 years old, giants, creation stories, talking snakes, angels making out with women, sea monsters, people being turned into salt, human sacrifice as a good thing,... Compared to that some of the Greek myths actually look realistic.

And in this way each time that repentance comprehends guilt it understands that the eleventh hour has come: that hour which human indolence knows well enough exists and will come, when it is talked about in generalities, but not when it actually applies to the indolent one himself.

While I agree that the image of parent stooping to look a child in the eye and talk to a child on his or her level is helpful when some people think of how God interacts with us, I also think that this image or idea does some damage to how it is that we humans actually think of God.

a mentally retarded black man doing everything a human being could possibly do at a high school football game — greeting the crowd, providing radio commentary, delivering the pregame pep talk, running water bottles to the players, cheering with the cheerleaders, leading the halftime marching band and racing across the field with the school flag after touchdowns — everything except actually playing, and basking in his town's love every mad minute of it.

And on a Friday night in a South Carolina town, his encounter with a mentally retarded black man doing everything a human being could possibly do at a high school football game — greeting the crowd, providing radio commentary, delivering the pregame pep talk, running water bottles to the players, cheering with the cheerleaders, leading the halftime marching band and racing across the field with the school flag after touchdowns — everything except actually playing, and basking in his town's love every mad minute of it.

I recently saw the movie «Her,» and while it isn't the best movie I've ever seen, it is pretty much at the top when it comes to raising fascinating questions: what it means to be human, what we mean when we talk about love and intimacy, what sex is, and yes, how we can be so connected to and dependent on technology — especially technology that responds in loving ways and gives us exactly what we want — that we actually can have a romantic relationship with it.

Steve: Tell you a quick story, I was listening to Rush Limbaugh once, which I do as an exercise every once in a while, and he was talking about how, you know, environmentalism is a sham because this is actually what he said: «How can we believe, how can humans believe that we could possibly damage something that God made?»

We now understand that humans are actually a holobiome: a super organism which Kiran compares to a «walking, talking rainforest»

Dating is a stage of romantic relationships in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a Actually meeting the person you are talking to is one of the most important steps to online dating.

he actually talk publicly about how to kill masses of humans.

It would be my preference that you would be found to be simply wrong and all the politicians and economists, their benefactors and the talking heads in the mass media actually had an adequate enough understanding of the way the world works and a realistic recognition of the «placement» of the human species within the natural order of living things.

2) I've talked to lots of scientists doing simulations of all sorts of things: — automobiles (Computational Fluid Dynamics for streamlining, crash codes for simulating care crashes — for the latter, sometimes simulations tell the designers that removing metal actually makes a car safer (ex: Ford Taurus, at one point)-- airplanes — bridges, oil platforms, buildings — human blood vessels and likely effects of surgery

While those who stand in denial of climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and evidence of human - induced climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story (in more than half the cases, according to the academic researchers Boykoff and Boykoff) by quoting one scientist talking about the risks and one purported expert saying that climate change was not happening — or might actually be a good thing.

Thank god only one living human has the complete lack of character required to talk this talk and actually think we should all oblige.

We'll skip the humans and talk about polar bears in a bit, but let's first talk about the underlying issue: what science means — and how it's actually quite easy to harness your own intelligence to interests that may want to try to confuse you.

The IPCC and AGW hypothesis supporters like to talk about net CO2 because it looks scary, but compared to the actual flux of CO2 and the associated uncertainty the human contribution is actually pretty small.

All the variables are largely unknown but it's more useful to the agenda to guess with confidence than talk about the fact that humans emit less than 5 % of co2 compared to nature (we actually have a good estimate on that).

Climate «sceptics» accuse climate scientists of exaggerating the evidence for human - caused climate change in order to secure their own funding; but actually I think that any vested interests in talking up the problem lie elsewhere.

Nevertheless, I did my best to defend my thesis (expressed in prior talks and posts) that while Legal A.I. is an unstoppable technological force, the impending «machine learning age» will actually be a «human learning age» in disguise, by returning precious time back to attorneys to focus on more meaningful and satisfying work.

Before your child has a friend over, talk to your kid about what activities he'd be interested in doing that actually involve interacting with another human, like playing miniature golf or swimming.

The nanorods even respond to the human voice, meaning chatty mobile users could actually power their own phone while they talk.

Actually, jobseekers need to focus their primary energy on networking and talking to human beings, rather than settling for the online «cattle call» with thousands of other candidates and hoping somebody picks them out of the blue.