Sentences with phrase «actually teaching the concepts»

These are words that should be used within the context of actually teaching the concepts themselves.

Not exact matches

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

By using various strategies proposed in this article, you'll ensure that your students not only understand what you are teaching them; but that they actually take that knowledge back into their real world and apply the new concepts to improve their overall performance and achieve organizational goals and objectives.

Taken from the perspective of the student, the types of adults and supports the student needs might actually drive a new framework for the teaching profession, rather than rejiggering old concepts to fit this new model in a way that might replicate the achievement gap down the line.

But I hadn't really had the framework of the different registers and the specific structures that are in place and the entire concept of explicitly teaching that to the students was kind of foreign to me... I hadn't really considered doing that before whereas now I see how valuable that is for students and how effective it is... how to actually explicitly teach that language so they're able to engage in that discussion instead of being perplexed that it wasn't happening.

The report does not actually contain items that specifically mention «drill,» work their way methodically through the key concepts of literacy and mathematics,» or «taught to the test,» but I believe the reporters (and perhaps Gates officials) are referencing the test prep items with these phrases.

While the absurd Common Core Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) testing scheme is a «high - stakes» test designed to fail students, the NAEP has sought to reflect whether a random group of students have a basic understanding of the key concepts that are actually being taught at each appropriate grade level.

One teacher noted to me, «I use the student state test data to give me information about how my teaching of key concepts, such as fractions, actually translated for my students compared to students across the state.»

When I taught these concepts / issues to students desiring actually to learn them or honestly to explore / debate / even counter them I used no such provocative language even when they had other views.

(And as somebody who has actually taught systems thinking, it is beholden on me to point out that the concept described as «Systemic Causation» in Curry's quote of Lakoff is completely nonsensical.

I was also actually taught to produce correspondence reports, hence the 1000 word short essay, the minimum SCIENCE expects to allow the elucidation of concept, used to produce a précis outline of «papers» also.

I don't mean the sort of respect that is old fashioned «teaching by authority», where you accept and memorize everything I say because I'm the teacher and I said so; I actually tell my students not to believe what I way just because I'm the teacher, to challenge it, to test it, and then when it makes sense or corresponds to their experiences in the labs (which at least spot check the concepts, although such checks can not be exhaustive) accept it and build a strong conceptual understanding.

It really wouldn't surprise me because this PhD physics teaching about gases actually really believed that our atmosphere was empty space, he had no concept of gases with volume etc..

You're taught skills and concepts important to your career, but rarely do educational institutions actually focus on the steps and skills needed to actually land a job.

The chatbot concept reminds me of current situations where customers call online banking, or web providers or call centres provided by email service providers, and end up speaking to someone in a foreign country, a nice person but no good command of English and had been taught to answer questions in nearly robot fashion, not actually answering the question at all.