Sentences with phrase «actually testing models»

Not exact matches

This was actually the first strollers I kept after testing a few dozens other models and returning them back.

If we can be calm as a child tests out what the boundary and line in the sand actually is, then we are modeling for our child how to handle this in their own lives.

With these factors in mind, researchers constructed a computer model and tested it to see how well its projections aligned with how the virus actually spread.

Bowern counters that the phylogenetic methods are actually ideal for investigating borrowing, because you can test models with different rates of borrowing and see how well the resulting trees match known facts.

Future experiments can test this model using grids of light sensors with holes in them to see if they actually can catch as many sunflecks as grids without holes.

In preliminary test runs, Kai Pfister has managed to demonstrate that this new diesel fuel can actually power a model car.

«We have found an implementation of the system that allows us to go in the lab and actually test the predictions of the Dicke model, and some extensions of it as well, in a system that is not nearly as complicated as people always thought it has to be for the Dicke physics,» Engels said.

«I am an amazing experimental model because if you put robots below me, we can actually test hypotheses,» Herr says.

«We will use the models to predict how our nuclear safety components will perform in numerous postulated accident scenarios without actually conducting tests,» Sichler said.

For example, if the process were used to create liver cells for a drug test, the resulting product «would actually have vascularization in it that is modeled on how a liver works.»

Now, when scientists build climate models, they test them by running them for the past and seeing if the models replicate what actually happened.

Maybe one day we will move away from this «indicator» analysis model, or at least develop indicators that are broad enough to actually mean something at test time.

NMPED and the Albuquerque Journal Editorial Board both underscore the point that teachers are still primarily being (and should primarily continue to be) evaluated on the basis of their own students» test scores (i.e., using a value - added model (VAM)-RRB-, but it is actually not that simple.

To assume that tests accurately capture teacher effectiveness is to overlook discrepancies among the official curriculum set forth by state and district officials, the curriculum that teachers actually choose to teach, and the learned curriculum that students pick up through teachers» modeling and expectations.

But after the hype dies down, actually bringing the Model 3 to market will be a huge test for the EV automaker.

It's likely, however, that this body is just a test mule body of the plug - in hybrid model but isn't actually a hybrid.

While that might appear lower than the previous hybrid, the EPA rolled out stricter testing procedures for 2017 models, so Honda estimates that mileage is actually up 1 in the city and 2 on the highway.

The GLA250 model actually delivers decent fuel economy, its turbocharged 2 - liter four - cylinder engine rated in EPA tests at 24 mpg city and 32 mpg highway.

In fact, all these modifications are similar to the ones seen on the M135i, meaning there's a big chance this test car is actually the M235i Convertible that will sit between the regular model and the brawnier M2.

2018 dodge durango srt first look the motor trend → 2018 dodge durango mid sized seven passenger suv → 2018 dodge durango srt 392 first test flying brick → Roar!!!! 2017 dodge durango v 6 awd youtube → Is the 2018 dodge durango srt actually faster than the → 2018 dodge durango suv dodge canada dodge → 2018 dodge durango indepth model review car and driver → Springs and stripes 2018 dodge durango gets lower and louder → Dodgesrt infuses durango gt with srtinspired rallye → Dodge challenger wikipedia →

Maybe the company means that this is the first affordable all - wheel - drive sedan that's actually attractive - though Subaru did mess up the test model with the addition of a dumb rear air spoiler that does nothing at all for the car.

I have been a Camry driver for quite some time, and was actually on the way to purchase a 2007 model but decided to stop by my local Nissan dealership to test out the 2007 Altima.

See, when Volkswagen said we could test their entire 2012 U.S. lineup, what they actually meant was that we could test almost all of the cars that will be available at one point or another, and in one form or another, for said model year.

My test car's turbo four is actually sourced from Mercedes - Benz, an older engine used to power the German automaker's lower - priced models including the CLA250, the GLA250, and the Metris van.

We did countless CFD [computational flow dynamics] tests on the computer, and actually it's the computer that helped us model and finesse this beautiful shape and get fifty percent more air into those inlets.

The test car, a base model SE, actually costs about $ 300 less than last year's similar LE model once the price is adjusted for the extra equipment that is now standard, said Pontiac's Ed Lechtzin.

In a head to head test vs the upgraded model, this entry level one actually produces better audio, but suffered with the video resolution.

To see how much blue light screens are giving off, the group tested some of «the latest» LE devices, including an iPad Air, iPhone 5s, and a Kindle Paperwhite 1st generation (yes, they're actually older models — but the team addresses this as a limitation in the discussion at the end of the paper).

Answer 2: A variety of value metrics that display phenomenal performances can be used, but in Quantitative Value, we rigorously tested all formulas to determine what worked best, and a lot of simple models like P / E actually perform very well.

No, that is not correct, both papers seek to determine whether the observational data are consistent with the models, however Douglass et al use a statistical test that actually answers a different question, namely «is there a statistically significant difference between the mean trend of the ensemble and the observed trend».

Spencer's claim of low sensitivity and negative feedbacks is based on this test, which is actually a test of models» ability to reproduce ENSO, and based on his internal variability hypothesis, which as noted above, Dessler's paper has also put to rest.

It doesn't pass a sniff test: if we actually inserted this range of cloud forcing into the GCMs, will we ever get model temperatures that are below absolute zero or hotter than the Sun?

Thing is with all those models I used, there were empirical tests to proof the model as well as real world tests to see if what we «modelled» actually gave us the projected results — often an iterative process to «tune» the models.

Anybody willing to drive a car for which the design has never be actually crash tested, but only modeled?

These models can be (and must be) tested in hindcast runs to assess their level of skill at predicting what actually occurred.

It turns out that some of the assumptions used in man - made global warming theory (and in the current climate models) had never actually been tested.

Actually a computer model is not even a test of a hypothesis.

This is important, because many people mistakenly assume that the authors of the detection / attribution chapters in the IPCC reports were actually testing man - made global warming theory and the climate models.

That is actually an interesting question, a worthy thing to build a model to test.

Rather than confounding the climate consensus, mid-century cooling is actually a good test for the climate models, one they are passing quite convincingly.

The other point is the model results published in 2007, actually start in 2001, so thats the data you want to start your test.

So what the «validation» test is actually showing is that driving the AO model with an SST record with a reduced variation, produces a result that is closer to the land record than driving it with a larger variation.

Unlike climate models, asset - pricing and transaction models can actually be tested for accuracy and effectiveness.

Unfortunately this test will take the time needed to improve the models, make new predictions, and then wait to see what the climate actually does.

If you remove anthropogenic forcing of the past century (i.e. hold CO2 at the preindustrial level of 280 ppm) and do test runs, including all known natural modes of internal variability that actually occurred over the past century, including solar, ENSO, PDO, AMO, and volcanic forcing, no model run even comes close to simulating the climate after about 1960, with huge divergence occurring in about 1980.

It is an unfortunate gap in understanding even in many people who actually consider themselves well informed on time series that they misuse standard tests for coefficient significance as if they indicate validity of inference using a reduced model.

Tests of models using those estimates of climate sensitivity predict about twice as much warming as actually occurred.

The important thing (in terms of testing the models with respect to what they're actually supposed to be good for) is whether the prediction envelope basically follows the trend over multiple decades.

This is reminiscent of how the Model S technically received more than 5 out of 5 stars (5.4 stars, actually) during a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test, though for the official papers that was rounded down to 5 stars.

Interestingly, as discussed above, it's actually possible to get a perfect PEI score of 1, and I started to find my model maxing out at 1 in a few of my test runs when the total number of calls was very small.