But if people
actually voted on the issue, politics could drive change in education.
Not exact matches
Such conversations can reveal which
issues your shareholders
actually care about — maybe board diversity isn't even
on their radar, and won't be a deal - breaker come
vote time.
Despite talking for a month about an option to bypass leadership's stonewalling
on DACA legislation and saying he had the
votes to do so, California Republican Rep. Jeff Denham refused to say if he would
actually use it at a press conference
on the
issue Wednesday.
You also have people who can register as a specfic party and run
on a ticket to strengthen their careers and yet they only espouse one or two things that could count them into the party in the first place.There's also a huge
issue of people really thinking that a
vote for a 3rd party candidate is a waste, If the only way you feel your
vote matters is by
voting for one of 2 parties (even if you are unsatisfied with both) does it
actually matter?
When you pro-life contradictions stop acting like life begins at conception and ENDS AT BIRTH, when you stop using abortion as a political wedge
issue to shore up
votes and show that you
actually understand and act
on ALL the complex
issues at work, you might
actually find others more sympathetic to your alleged cause.
Maybe the media should focus
on the real
issues instead of the religion of the candidates we might
actually get some info to use for making an intelligent decision in the
voting booth.
The founders of Black Lives Matter refute these 11 stated misconceptions about their movement; they ignore Black
on Black crime, they're leaderless, they have no agenda, they're a one -
issue movement (Police brutality), they don't respect their elders, they reject the Black Church, they don't care about Queer / Trans lives, they hate White people, they hate Police officers, politically speaking their focus should be the
vote, and they're not
actually a movement.
When they know that we'll show up
on voting day and make our voice heard, they'll be far more likely to address the
issues that concern us when they're
actually in government.
Because everyone has to
vote, the whole country may become more politically literate and they might
actually learn what their positions
on different
issues are, allowing them to make very informed decisions about their choice.
While New York City Democrats would likely be the most frustrated if there's no agreement in 2016, there are dozens of lawmakers throughout the state who had to grapple with the
issue on the campaign trail this year, and thus suffered a political headache for
voting in favor of a budget bill that included a provision which didn't
actually wind up raising their salary.
Comparatively few Labour MPs
actually voted for the Lib Dem motion but an awful lot of people sat
on their hands as a way of showing their determination to finish this
issue.»
What
actually happened was that Tories under Dominic Grieve - who has a poor
voting record
on these
issues - supported a wrecking amendment that had been moved by the Tory peer Lord Waddington in May 2008.
They can
vote in Parliament
on issues like stem cell research and policy
on mad cow disease, they can pass the Government's science budget without even knowing what it says, but they can not
actually engage with the scientific community.
See http://www.cfr.org/climate-change/candidates-climate-change/p14765 which says that «McCain has been one of the most outspoken members of Congress
on the
issue of climate change» and he «managed to force the first real Senate
vote on actually doing something about the largest environmental peril our species has yet faced.»