Sentences with phrase «actually writing of your book»

If she has to get involved in the actually writing of your book or content editing, there will be additional fees.

Not exact matches

But it takes a lot to move from talking about writing a book to actually doing it — and this is the biggest leap of all.

He experienced it again in the late 1990s when he wrote a book that considered the potentially liberating power of Web 2.0 (before it was actually known as that).

These outfits have been largely hoisted on their own financial petards and now they can't figure out a way to get their deals out the door and sell their story to the public suckers without the embarrassment of a downward valuation when the underwriters actually start writing the deal book; and (3) They're already a dead dog, living on borrowed time.

In his book «The Films of Steven Spielberg,» author Douglas Brode wrote that Spielberg actually performed more of a directorial role than the film's credited director Tobe Hooper («The Texas Chainsaw Massacre»).

[42:14] Tony explains the questions to ask an advisor, to ensure they're truly on your side [42:28] 60 % of people surveyed today say they believe their financial advisor is putting the company interests above their own — it's actually worse than they believe [42:45] Why Tony has chosen to support Peter and his firm, Creative Planning [43:33] How you can get a second opinion from Peter's firm, Creative Planning, through their website (www.GetASecondOpinion.com)-- it doesn't matter how much or little you have, they'll give you feedback [44:00] Tony's biggest challenge when writing his first book, and how it brought him to Peter Mallouk [44:30] Peter explains the process Creative Planning went through to open their services to people at the $ 100,000 level, and how offering this extensive range of services to people at this level is unprecedented

So regardless of whether or not earnings can actually carry debt burdens, or how aggressively bad investments are being written down from book value, investors need never know.

What's so great about the book, and what makes it different from the countless other books and articles written about the «Oracle of Omaha,» is that it offers readers valuable insight into how Buffett actually thinks about investments.

I read a cdn arts book written by a socialist kind of like Frasier Crane who actually turned me off arts funding a bit.

Ironically, it's these incremental economic gains that may actually telegraph cracks in the North Korean government, Bennett writes in his recent book, «Preparing for the Possibility of a North Korean Collapse.»

No God wrote any bible as the bible is simply a book of compiled stories written by people and the bible was actually written 300 years after the birth of Jesus (if he was) and the reality is most American ministers, priest, etc could have never read the first bible since it was written in Greek and changed over, and over, and over again.

Many books written for Religion actually touch on the subject which is Love and being NON JUDGMENTAL because there can be no human that can tell me they know exactly what God is only my faith and love towards myself and my fellow Humans is an expression of his love not the intolerance or hatred that is spewed out in the name of God, God is ABOVE all of that CRAP PERIOD.

On a whole wall actually, just kind of wrote it out and it was the whole length of our offices and we would sit on chairs on wheels and we would all slide along, slide on, slide in and that became the overall skeleton structure of the book.»

But I bet when you try to use the logic to really analyze the Bible, your brain uses some form of chemical to stop yourself from believing the truth of who actually wrote those books and why.

He died before I was born, but I thought as long as I was plagiarizing the book of Matthew (also written after His death), I'd just add this whole 3:16 part in because those silly jews don't think Jesus was actually the messiah (who cares if he didn't really fulfill all the required prophecies.

You may not know this, but lots of god believers actually point to an old book, which was obviously written by people promoting a religious idea, as proof of what their god said.

I've lost count of the number of times I've looked at a book and questioned whether it actually needed to be written...

Until then, if you are troubled by what I have written above, or if you were troubled by the way God was portrayed in this movie, but you are not troubled by the way God is actually portrayed in the book of Exodus, you might want to ask yourself «Why?»

Over the years, I've been an observer of the movement to the point where I've actually had students write papers on Calvary Chapel and discussed the movement in my book, Viral Churches.

«Very few of the recent books about Pius XII and the Holocaust (writes Rabbi Dalin) are actually about Pius XII and the Holocaust.

Actually Josephus» Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93 — 94 AD, includes two references to Jesus in Books 18 and 20 and a reference to John the Baptist in Book 18.

We could point to examples of semantic structure, grammatical style, references to culture, and a whole host of other historical critical standards to prove by scholarly consensus that the author whose name is on the book did not actually write it.

So what you're trying to tell me is that jesus can perform miracles, he did so for a crapload of people, but since it was also thrown into the bible that he can't perform for evil people (or wicked generation or whatever) and since we're all sinners he can't perform miracles so we just have to trust him, actually not him necessarily, a book written by a bunch of people 100's of years after jesus who also weren't seeing miracles done, so they decided that since no more miracles were happening, it's our fault.

But they presage the opening dirgelike phrases of his Decline and Restoration, the «other book» that weighed upon his heart from his very first days at the university but which he did not actually begin to write until after the outbreak of World War I, in 1914:

because someone writes in a book «and thousands of people saw it happen» doesn't actually make it so.

Of the five books of the surviving The Herald of Divine Love, only Book Two was actually written by heOf the five books of the surviving The Herald of Divine Love, only Book Two was actually written by heof the surviving The Herald of Divine Love, only Book Two was actually written by heof Divine Love, only Book Two was actually written by her.

Well, this argument states that while the Bible accurately records the thoughts, actions, and ideas of the various Biblical authors and the people to whom the various books were written, these thoughts, actions, and ideas may not actually be the thoughts, actions, and ideas that God endorses, nor the thoughts, ideas, and actions that we are to copy.

The «Pastor Pusher» post is actually part of a longer chapter in the book I'm writing, Close Your Church for Good.

When being a woman who preaches the Gospel or teaches with authority or writes a book that actually isn't expressly meant to be shelved in the «Women» section of the bookstore isn't so worthy of note.

The pop - culture Austenmania that kicked off in 1995, when the BBC released its now - iconic, Colin - Firth - in - a-wet-shirt adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, sometimes threatens to bury the books Austen actually wrote under an avalanche of souvenir fridge magnets, dishtowels, and tote bags.

I got interviewed yesterday by Ken Briggs who is writing a book for Eerdman's on the connection (or actually, the DISconnection) between the message of the church and the needs and issues of our culture.

My purpose, therefore, is not to provide a systematic critique of the book, but rather to comment on two of its more interesting aspects, namely: (1) its argument that the Federalists, in writing the Constitution, were actually defending the principle of the «neutral» state, and (2) its attempt to apply «neutral state» principles to the issues of abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia.

But then you'd have to realize no one with mental illness today (that I know of) claims such things or writes books about what God actually says.

Though the memories of the disciples of Jesus are no doubt reflected in some way in the Gospels, it now seems probable that no New Testament book was actually written by one who had known Jesus in the flesh.

@fred — the book of numbers is indeed referred as one of the books of moses, it wasn't written by him — there is actually (at least in the bible) 5 books of moses — in reality there is i think 25 books of moses — he didn't write them... oral traditions... they were write down in parts, then added together later.

Scott, This is actually a few paragraphs pulled out of a book I am writing on the church, so yes, by itself, the paragraphs are lacking.

In the same vein, right - wing conservatives insist that Moses actually wrote the entire Pentateuch (first five Books of the Bible) despite the overwhelming literary and linguistic evidence to the contrary, they do so primarily because the Bible can be quoted to the effect that Moses wrote it.

So... the faithful believe that their respective books are divinely inspired, that the written word, no matter how screwed up it has become through translation, is actually «the word of God.»

Problem definition is time - consuming, a deep journey into our own prejudices and hopes for a Christian faith that actually makes a difference, a horrible awakening that giants of the faith may have little faith in God and more in courts and money, that fame - seekers exist within the church system and garner friends as shields, that a man that marries a second wife may wish to destroy the first wife at any cost, and that authors can indeed write good books but run away from women speaking of their own abuse, and that prior friendships dictate the limits of Christianity....

Knowing things like the parallelism of Hebrew poetry, the ancient letter form, and the characteristics of apocalyptic literature would help us receive the books that biblical authors actually wrote.

I haven't ever been here before and I don't know if I'll be here again and so I'm just going to let myself be happy and dorky about the fact that my name is on the cover of a book and I wrote that book and I love that book so much and I'm excited about people actually reading it.

Part of this, I'm sure, is fear of rejection, but as I've thought about writing for publication over the past few years, I'm actually quite relieved those three books are not published.

Author: Nick PageNick Page is one of very, very few British Christian authors who actually make their living from writing books.

Nick Page is one of very, very few British Christian authors who actually make their living from writing books.

It was later when Christianity was legalized, actually (forced) by Constantine, a Roman by 311ce, changing this book from its original writing, under the Council of Nicaea.

To those who would find such conceptual wavering unlikely; Ford's answer is that Whitehead never actually abandoned the concept of God as formative element in Religion in the Making, the fourth and last part of that book, where Whitehead writes about God as the conceptual valuation of the realm of ideal forms, is nothing else than the result of «a theistic projection based on the revelation of Western religions» («Growth» 11).

I actually started off writing a different book and wrote most of that book and toward the end of it I called a friend who is a great writing coach and he set me down and said, «OK, I think you're writing the wrong book, I think you've found that there's a symptom here and you're not dealing with the problem.»

People are talking about it, writing books about it, and most certainly thinking about it during the most boring moments at work (let's admit it, you're actually reading this during one of those moments, aren't you?)

When I read books of people writing about how they understand the task of the church (Brian McLAren, Bob Roberts, Eric Bryant, Ron Martoia, Scot McKnight, to name but a few) I find that all of them are actually propagating a return to the Biblical principles.

This is a remarkably daring text, the sort of book many academics avoid like the plague: a book aimed at a wide reading public, written with the hope that it might actually change the lives of some of its readers.