Then go back to your desk and write in a fashion that advances your client's case effectively without resorting to what may be viewed by the court as
ad hominem attacks on a fellow attorney.
The global warming community spends a lot of time with
ad hominem attacks on skeptics, usually accusing them of being in the pay of oil and power companies, but they all know that their own funding in turn would dry up rapidly if they were to show any bit of skepticism in their own work.
A funny thing has happened in climate science to scientific inquiry: the usual ethics of free discussion and fact - based criticism have been discarded in favor of
ad hominem attacks on critics of AGW theory.
Fifty posts and NO SCIENCE FACTS OR THEORIES — just
ad hominem attacks on a man that helped keep the West free and whose work has added billions of dollars of wealth through applications of his work.
Ad hominem attacks on your interlocutors are especially amusing when you then make a fool of yourself in similar vein (or perhaps vain in your case).
We have seen the unedifying spectacle of scientists refusing to share their data, fiddling their results, and resorting to
ad hominem attacks on those who have exposed their work to be fraudulent.
Whether they stack the deck on funding, or give a pass on paper reviews, or gloss over their friends» failings, or use public,
ad hominem attacks on people that have a different view... to people like Gleick these things are acceptable, even noble, because they are trying to save the world.
Most engage in
ad hominem attacks on those who dare raise counter-arguments.
At first, I was moved by things like the retreating glaciers, but then I came across a paper by Lindzen, and soon after saw some of
the ad hominem attacks on him.
It's time for the «convinced» to start beefing up their scientific arguments; they are not going to win any arguments by making
ad hominem attacks on other scientists.
The vociferousness
ad hominem attacks on Pielke Jr., Bengtsson, and Judith, are very different than scientific criticism.
I call B * ll *** t. All of your points so far have been
ad hominem attacks on RC, and apparently you are not willing to come up with an independent though (which reflects that you actually read the back - and - forths of Mann et al), that you are willing to put up for cross-examination.
You can not and will not alter the reality of climate change by
ad hominem attacks on those who bear the bad news.
as always
the ad hominem attacks on people if they are not «as literate» as the poster think they should be..
Instead, it prefers to disparage something or someone by association, by making
ad hominem attacks on (real or imagined) supporters of whatever it scorns.
Inappropriate The list (including its title or description) facilitates illegal activity, or contains hate speech or
ad hominem attacks on a fellow Goodreads member.
He told the New York Times in a statement Thursday that «as a general rule, I haven't found nasty
ad hominem attacks on a person whose cooperation is needed to help your state especially helpful.»
Your ad hominem attacks on the Cardinal and Catholicism aren't fooling anyone.
And by levying
ad hominem attacks on his detractors, he remains outside genuine historical discussion.
The opinion was of a kind we are used to seeing by now from Justice Kennedy: long on windy rhetoric about «dignity» and
ad hominem attacks on the basic human decency of the law's defenders, and short on actual coherent legal reasoning from recognizable constitutional principles.
Ignore the lengthy historical information I have posted, and skip to
the ad hominem attacks on me 2.
Harce, the UCP MLA's
ad hominem attacks on two expert economists were an attempt to discredit their arguments by casting aspersions on their character.
«This is not the first time Pachauri has launched
an ad hominem attack on his critics since becoming chairman of the IPCC.
For instance, the very first paragraph does not discuss any scientific issue but instead comprises a weary and oft - rebutted
ad hominem attack on the NIPCC's scientific authors (``... purport to be independent....»)
You are just using
an ad hominem attack on the web site where I found the referenced article and that is sufficient for you to discredit all the data so carefully accumulated in that article.
The gratuitous
ad hominem attack on a family man when combined with confused aspersions aimed a Bastardi tell a different story — i.e., the Left is seriously lost at sea without Bush to blame and their cries that we are all headed for the edge of the world make humanity look small indeed.
Typically STT wrote
an ad hominem attack on Tim, accusing him of «cash for comment» and even of being «a fool».
Your comment is
an ad hominem attack on Mr. Gore, not a response to the posting.
[REPLY: Which only shows that you have no clue about the distinction between an illegitimate
ad hominem attack on a person, and a legitimate intellectual attack on that persons ideas, motivations, and political agenda.
Not exact matches
These days they often include argumentum
ad hominem attacks, such as sly references to the agencies» sterling ratings
on Lehman Brothers the day before it filed for bankruptcy, that distract from relevant discussion about the country's creditworthiness.
And
on Wednesday, Trump tweeted a pointed
ad hominem attack, saying that Mueller «is most conflicted of all,» and accused Mueller of going «crazy» because there's «no collusion.»
Most of the «rules for blogging» I have come across — like Alan Jacobs's «Rules for Deportment for Online Discourse» — focus
on very basic things like avoiding
ad hominem attacks and not arguing in bad faith.
Well, I picked my sons up from practice, come back here to this site, and still find some of the most pathetic, name - calling, personal
ad -
hominem attacks on others I've seen in awhile... It makes me think that I waste time being
on here with some of you.
dalahast / AE, please cease your childish
ad hominems, and try for a change to find the courage to reply without making personal
attacks on me and others here.
Or perhaps I simply realize that many of the so called rational atheists who post
on CNN are dedicated to reason only as long as it supports their positions and when it doesn't immediately switch to
ad hominem attacks to try to get people to ignore the legitimate point that was made.
But I touched
on some nerves for you to start
ad hominem attacks like that.
It is not an
ad hominem, since an
ad hominem would
attack the person making the claim
on their actual character.
If you're looking for your comment and don't see it here, it's because you've violated The Lunch Tray's longstanding policy against
ad hominem, personal
attacks on this blog.
While Spitzer argued early
on in the debate that «
ad hominem attacks at this point are really not appropriate for this campaign,» the former governor pushed Stringer
on his record.
The Cruise
attack,
on the other hand, exemplifies «poisoning the well,» another brand of
ad hominem attacks in which the character assault is launched before the listener has a chance to form his or her own opinion
on a subject — in this case, Cruise's film.
These examples illustrate classic uses of
ad hominem attacks, in which an argument is rejected, or advanced, based
on a personal characteristic of an individual rather than
on reasons for or against the claim itself.
The Monckton article seemed perfectly reasonable to me, and the
attacks on him here are mostly
ad hominem.
But more disappointing is that Prof. Greene would end
on such a low note, and would stoop to
ad hominem attacks, while claiming to argue for the high road.
But Ravitch really outdid herself
on May 25th when she went after Ben Austin in a vicious
ad hominem attack.
But this morning, Jonathan Pelto came out with an
ad hominem attack about us
on his blog called «Can ConnCAN Con Conn» that claims to have uncovered some sort of hidden agenda.»
I see you want to cast aspersions here and I bet you believed you were being clever when claiming you were doing an
ad hominem attack; you weren't, by the way, you specifically mentioned that you were
attacking an argument and
ad hominem would be an
attack on my person as a rebuttal to my argument)
@proof2006: disqus I was really hoping that you were going to clarify something, instead of just going for
ad hominem attacks about how I'm stupid for wanting a lot of storage
on my phone.
There's more in the article to debunk, such as the
ad hominem attack against rescuers, but I've addressed them before and my response is already bordering
on a book (for more information, see the links throughout).
Rather than attempting to address the points dissenters are raising, these are routinely countered by
ad -
hominem attacks on their character.»
And don't tell me you're monitoring the blog to weed out personal
attacks and
ad hominems because we see this sort of thing
on RealClimate all the time.