Leaving aside your gross ignorance about how modern science operates — e.g. the fact that it operates by consensus and peer review —
your ad hominem remarks about how scientists deliberately distort the truth and suppress opposing research are nothing if not personal attacks.
Other than that I noticed you started
ad hominem remarks (not like I care because it shows the level you went) when thes are not called for.
I assume that you are in fact adults, but instead of intelligent replies disputing the «commandments» made by Colin, you have only silly
ad hominem remarks reminiscent of arguments on an elementary school playground.
Ad hominem remarks abounded.
Not exact matches
Brigitte, you literally insulted my own
remarks and claim that a correct statement of ignorance on your part is an
ad hominem.
When we pillory critics for saying hard but true things; when our leaders who've championed inclusiveness issue (and defend) bigoted
remarks; when we plod from one spiteful spat to the next, played out (performed, really) in online forums and social media with all the requisite snark and
ad hominem attacks, it's worth asking what kind of audience are we?
I can tell when a liberal American comments by the snotty
remarks and
ad hominems.