Since all of these things have been discussed
ad nauseum here, here and elsewhere, that kind of «scepticism» (more accurately described as contrarianism, or «la - la - la - I - can't - hear - you» - ism) serves only to waste time.
@lucasdavis500 That's been discussed
ad nauseum here; I think Pete did a good job covering that in his answer (pointing out the inefficiency plus why he thinks it's appropriate here).
Not exact matches
I mean, there are plenty of stories on CNN, why come
here to blather on nonsensically
ad nauseum??? I am really curious about that.
what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over
here, «there is no proof of your God»
ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get
here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.
The Krauss / Shermer side sounds incredibly familiar... almost as if those same arguments have been pasted
here (
ad nauseum) but without crediting the originators.
There was a group on
here howling with outrage that we didn't buy him but that is all quietly forgotten now — same with all the other lost «saviours» that were repeated
ad nauseum on
here — Benteke, Schneiderlin, Schweinsteiger, Pedro, Remy, Bony, Falcao, Otamendi, Depay, Gomis etc etc..
Haven't we had these discussions
ad nauseum on
here before — «clueless Arsenal» never knowing when to shut up shop.
The incursion of the rival gangs and the summary execution of the offending godfathers follows in bare structure the process of The Godfather, but it's gone through Fulci's filter
here, reduced to blank declarations of machismo and the same ridiculous series of assassinations
ad nauseum.
Instead of continuing with same same points being made over and over falling on deaf ears
ad nauseum, I shall stop
here.
[PS: This general subject has been discussed
ad nauseum in previous years — see
here for instance, and has appeared in the literature as well (for instance, Kaufmann and Stern (2002)-RRB-.
Le Pétomane pretends that I am tedious and tendentious — only because I disagree with his insanely obsessive argument repeated
here ad nauseum and to much disdain.
For those reasonable commenters
here who wonder why the pro - AGW / Runaway Global Warming / Climate Catastrophe trolls argue incessantly, and nitpick every point
ad nauseum,, the clear answer is given in this paper by a truly brave climate scientist, M.I.T.'s Prof. Richard Lindzen: click