Soft forks that do not degrade the security properties of Bitcoin, that do not take away from any currently used features, do not
add costs to miners, and are preferred by some, would result in profit - maximizing miners choosing to serve a wider audience by enforcing the soft fork.
Not exact matches
Iceland has long played home
to an ecosystem of bitcoin
miners, thanks
to the country's access
to abundant sources of geothermal power and Arctic air, the latter of which is key for keeping the power - hungry mining hardware cool without
added electricity
costs.
Adding a signal
to each block mined
costs miners nothing (and may even earn them extra money, if S2X supporters are willing
to pay), so it shouldn't be considered a reliable indicator.