Well, we cleverly
add science talks by our scientists Holly and Phil almost every day after dinner.
Not exact matches
Add to this the pressures of the cost - price squeeze to which Australian farmers have been subjected for decades, and it's not hard to picture the doom and gloom message promoted by
science writer Julian Cribb, who was
talking to his latest book, The Coming Famine: The Global Food Crisis and What We Can Do to Avoid It.
She started with traditional publishing but soon shifted to self - publishing, and she has plenty to
talk about for folks who are thinking of
adding romance to their
science fiction or fantasy.
But back to
science — and communicating it: Hansen (in his TED
talk and elsewhere) has said that the energy we
add to the atmosphere through GHG's every day is the equivalent of 400,000 Hiroshima bombs.
I would like to
add something that's not essential to the
science, but something I kind of believe, which is that you should not fool the layman when you're
talking as a scientist.
I would
add that scientists (and
science journalists) would do well to review the talk given by Thomas Lessl of the University of Georgia at the annual conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, on the limited role of science, even if communicated clearly, in shaping policy and human c
science journalists) would do well to review the
talk given by Thomas Lessl of the University of Georgia at the annual conference of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, on the limited role of science, even if communicated clearly, in shaping policy and human c
Science, on the limited role of
science, even if communicated clearly, in shaping policy and human c
science, even if communicated clearly, in shaping policy and human choices.
When Junk
Science contacted Nature Climate Change, the journal
talked to Emanuel and then
added his board memberships to the published study.
«I would like to
add something that's not essential to the
science, but something I kind of believe, which is that you should not fool the laymen when you're
talking as a scientist....
He
added: «I think there is too much focus on trying to stimulate an increasingly sterile debate on the
science, given the overwhelming body of opinion that there is now in favour of the
science, and perhaps if they are wanting to have an active debate they should be
talking about the policy responses to that
science, rather than the
science itself,» he said.
You see, this kind of thing is exactly what detracts from, rather than
adds to, the impression that the orthodoxy wants to
talk about the
science.