- To evaluate the strength of each school's instructional culture, the effectiveness of the training program in meeting partner needs, and ultimately the value -
added effect on student achievement results in partner schools
Not exact matches
In
effect, value -
added assessment «controls for» the influence of family income, ethnicity, and other circumstances
on students» initial level of
achievement.
More importantly, they say, the
effects persisted when children were aged 11, but
add `... the estimated
effects of school starting age
on other mental health constructs, which have weaker links to subsequent
student achievement, are smaller and less persistent.»
This removes, albeit imperfectly, the
effects of family background
on student achievement, so that we can focus solely
on what the schools
add to
student perform - ance.
The value -
added measures are designed to provide estimates of the independent
effect of the teacher
on the growth in a
student's learning and to separate this from other influences
on achievement such as families, peers, and neighborhoods.
ii ABSTRACT Isolating the
effect of a given teacher
on student achievement (value -
added modeling) is complicated when the
student is taught the same subject by more than one teacher.
None of the measures of data use had a significant
effect on student achievement when
added to the equation
on their own, nor did they have any unique explanatory value when combined with the four demographic measures in the final equation.
The most controversial of them include what is known as value -
added models1 that use data from standardized tests of
students as part of the overall measure of the
effect that a teacher has
on student achievement.
It is much harder to measure principal value -
added because
students don't change principals every year, and principals»
effects on students are mostly indirect: principals affect
student achievement through teachers.
In a provocative and influential paper, Jesse Rothstein (2010) finds that standard value -
added models (VAMs) suggest implausible future teacher
effects on past
student achievement, a finding that
«The results
add to a growing body of evidence nationally that so - called pay - for - performance bonuses for teachers that consist only of financial incentives have no
effect on student achievement,» reports the Times» Sharon Otterman.
They did this using a value -
added model as per current federal educational policy imperatives to assess the measurable
effects of teacher education programs
on their teacher graduates»
students» learning and
achievement as compared to other teacher education programs.
Dr. Good is also quick to acknowledge that, despite the reiterated notion that teachers matter and thus should possess (and continue to be trained in) effective teaching qualities (e.g., be well versed in their content knowledge, have strong classroom management skills, hold appropriate expectations, etc.), «fad - driven» education reform policies (e.g., teacher evaluation polices that are based in large part
on student achievement growth or teachers» «value -
added») have gone too far and have actually overvalued the
effects of teachers.