Not exact matches
However, a new University of Minnesota study with more than 1,000 young trees has found that plants also adjust — or acclimate — to a warmer
climate and may release only one - fifth as much
additional carbon dioxide than scientists previously believed, The study, published today in the journal Nature, is based
on a five - year project, known as «B4Warmed,» that simulated the
effects of
climate change on 10 boreal and temperate tree species growing in an open - air setting in 48 plots in two forests in northern Minnesota.
According to one study that looked at eight fuel aridity metrics in the Western U.S. and modeled
climate change's
effects on them, human - caused
climate change accounted for about 55 percent of the observed increases in fuel aridity between 1979 and 2015 (Figure 6), and added an estimated 4.2 million hectares of forest fire area between 1984 and 2015.7 Based
on all eight metrics, the Western U.S. experienced an average of 9
additional days per year of high fire potential due to
climate change between 2000 and 2015, a 50 percent increase from the baseline of 17 days per year when looking back to 1979.
New algorhitm allows researchers to gain
additional information
on the
effects of
climate change.
In order to understand the potential importance of the
effect, let's look at what it could do to our understanding of
climate: 1) It will have zero
effect on the global
climate models, because a) the constraints
on these models are derived from other sources b) the
effect is known and there are methods for dealing the errors they introduce c) the
effect they introduce is local, not global, so they can not be responsible for the signal / trend we see, but would at most introduce noise into that signal 2) It will not alter the conclusion that the
climate is
changing or even the degree to which it is
changing because of c) above and because that conclusion is supported by multiple
additional lines of evidence, all of which are consistent with the trends shown in the land stations.
«The
additional burden of CO2 added to the atmosphere by human activities... leads to the current «perturbed» global carbon cycle... These perturbations to the natural carbon cycle are the dominant driver of
climate change because of their persistent
effect on the atmosphere.»
New algorhitm allows researchers to gain
additional information
on the
effects of
climate change.
We are also pursuing
additional funds to forecast the
effects of
climate change on wildfire dynamics, and their
effects on boreal forest carbon balance.»
Add to that the role of the moon and big planets, Jupiter and Saturn, and the
effects on the geomagnetic field and galactic cosmic radiation and little is needed — indeed little room is left — for postulating a human causation as an
additional factor let alone a rational explanation for all or even most of observed
climate change.
Additional runs for 2000 with 1850
climate and for 2030 and 2100 (RCP 8.5) with 2000 emissions are designed to separate the
effects of
climate change on constituents and for isolating aerosol indirect
effects more cleanly using the clear - sky / all - sky flux diagnostics.
The social cost of carbon is the discounted monetary value of future
climate change damages due to
additional CO2 emissions (for example, the costs of adverse agricultural
effects, protecting against rising sea levels, health impacts, species loss, risks of extreme warming scenarios, and so
on).
In the case of the largest Arctic - flowing river in North America, the Mackenzie River, separating the
effects of
climate change from regulation has proven difficult because of the
additional dampening
effects on flow produced by natural storage - release
effects of major lake systems (e.g., Gibson et al., 2006; Peters et al., 2006).