Not exact matches
According to the organization, whose mission is to promote best practices, tools and methods for
family online safety, the decision by ICANN board members represents a step in the wrong direction and
fails to offer the
additional protection children need online.
That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it
fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner
family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the
additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.
The Recovery Act provides $ 10 billion in
additional Title I, Part A funds to state education agencies (SEAs) and local education agencies (LEAs) to support schools that have high concentrations of students from
families that live in poverty in order to help improve teaching and learning for students most at risk of
failing to meet state academic achievement standards.
Beyond this, the
families alleged that the network «repeatedly violated federal law by not offering students with disabilities alternative instruction when they were suspended,» and
failed to investigate «if the behavior leading to [these] suspensions was caused by disabilities and whether
additional services were needed» (Taylor 2016).
It is near the top 25 percent of worst cities in the U.S.. Its
additional exposure to natural disasters means that
failing to get home insurance is a risk not worth taking for the average
family.
Four hundred and sixty - three adolescents were excluded, due to incorrect phone details, or because they did not meet
additional requirements for inclusion in the study (both parents present, and presence of a sibling ≥ 10 years), and 583 actively refused to participate or
failed to provide written consent, resulting in the inclusion of 497
families (291 target adolescents at average risk and 206 at high risk for externalizing problems).