Implications include (i) the expectation of
additional global warming of about 0.6 °C without further change of atmospheric composition; (ii) the confirmation of the climate system's lag in responding to forcings, implying the need for anticipatory actions to avoid any specified level of climate change; and (iii) the likelihood of acceleration of ice sheet disintegration and sea level rise.
Therefore, any increase in losses could, more likely than not, be partly related to anthropogenic climate change... we advance the premise that if losses are affected by natural climate fluctuations, they are also likely to be affected
by additional global warming due to anthropogenic climate change.
But we advance the premise that if losses are affected by natural climate fluctuations, they are also likely to be affected by
additional global warming due to anthropogenic climate change.
«This is important because warming in the Arctic may expand the active layer and increase the discharge, leading to increased emissions from Arctic lakes and
driving additional global warming.»
Some climate scientists have looked at the potential impact of such an event and concluded that it likely would
delay additional global warming — but only until the sun returned to more - normal swings in sun - spot activity.
Climate changes are so large with «business - as - usual»,
with additional global warming of 2 - 3 °C (3.6 - 5.4 °F) that Hansen concludes» «business - as - usual» would be a guarantee of global and regional disasters.»
Implications include (i) the expectation of
additional global warming of about 0.6 - C without further change of atmospheric composition; (ii) the confirmation of the climate system's lag in responding to forcings, implying the need for anticipatory actions to avoid any specified level of climate change; and (iii) the likelihood of acceleration of ice sheet disintegration and sea level rise.
«Based on climate model studies and the history of the Earth the authors conclude that
additional global warming of about 1 °C (1.8 °F) or more, above global temperature in 2000, is likely to be dangerous.»
To some extent, I actually agree with Dr. Hansen on this point,
additional global warming would cause an albedo change - I just disagree that CO2 would have any affect.
It may be true that this could lead to
additional global warming, but there is no evidence for it now.
The scientists say their findings provide a hint, but only a hint, that
additional global warming could further intensify the cycle, the El Niño - Southern Oscillation, or ENSO, and thus bring more bouts of destructive weather.
Based on climate model studies and the history of the Earth, the Hansen and Sato conclude that
additional global warming of about 1ºC (1.8 ºF) or more, above global temperature in 2000, is likely to be dangerous.
The Heartland Institute, a Chicago organization, issued a document last week saying that
any additional global warming would likely be limited to a few tenths of a degree and that this «would not represent a climate crisis.»
Additional global warming could wreak havoc across the globe, potentially leading to food shortages, the flooding of major cities, and mass extinctions.