Project - specific
additionality standards have their detractors.
Not exact matches
Standing guard over the
additionality concept and generally vouching for the credibility of any given project — the key to any shred of environmental credibility as far as reducing greenhouse gas emissions goes — are
standard - setters like the Climate Action Reserve from California or the Voluntary Carbon Standard from Washingto
standard - setters like the Climate Action Reserve from California or the Voluntary Carbon
Standard from Washingto
Standard from Washington, D.C..
The Verified Carbon
Standard and the Gold
Standard require an assessment of project - specific
additionality.
Importantly,
additionality should be determined by an independent third - party, a requirement for internationally accepted
standards.
Additionality should not be self - determined and should not be self - defined, as each internationally accepted
standard defines it.
It is important to note that carbon offset verification
standards use different tests to determine
additionality.
ICROA members support the offset
standards included in the ICROA Code as the best available tools for assessing
additionality.
Determining the eligibility and
additionality of projects using
standard criteria, rather than project - specific assessments