People are
addressing him as Prophet, accusing him of various things, and never acknowledge his various injuries.
Not exact matches
Kindly try to understand that Quran, Islam and
Prophet are free from those pretending to be Muslims, therefore if you have any blame or bad word I kindly ask you to
address it to Muslims for being not perfect but keep aside from that the Quran, Islam and Muhammed since only Muslims might be not
as perfect
as the religion is..
Here you are putting the blame on al Islamic branches for one Islamic branch although the
as branches contradict each other and they are always in disputes among them and that's was the reason they became branches rather than one Islam so really it is not fear to hold all at guilt for one misbehave or abuse... nor it is fair to
address the whole Islam belief, Quran and
Prophet of God for the fault of ones or few that are not in the right track of Islam being the religion of peace and justice to mankind..
It is certainly not the saying of the
prophet, and Christians must not take it
as a model, but it is the kind of argument the ordinary man can
address to the ordinary man, and we must be on guard against scorning it (even if we are not to overrate it either).
The messages of Amos, Hosea, Micah, and Isaiah, while
addressed to Israel
as a whole, demanded decision and action on the part of the Israelite, and this appeal to intellectual discrimination and ethical choice involved a consequence more important than the
prophets probably guessed.
Where the
prophet thought of himself
as an individual
addressed by God, who then communicated the divine message to his people, he eschewed the idea of Spirit possession.
The
prophet knew himself
addressed by the divine «I» and
as he became aware of the tension between the requirements of that «I» and his own thought and feelings, he found himself called to responsibility for his actions in a new way.
Like the Hebrew
prophets and wise men whose belief he inherited, Jesus, so far
as we know, never
addressed himself to the kind of question that asks who, or what, God is, or what we mean when we use the word «God».
A truly apostolic Church may indeed
address presidents, legislatures, kings and dictators
as the
prophets and Paul did of old; but like them it will be less inclined to deal with the mighty than with the great mass, with the community
as it exists among the humble.
Deprived of native sympathy for academics and of a sense of ease in dealing with them — indeed, inclined to view them with misgiving — these ecclesiastics did not by instinct
address themselves to their institutions in their office
as articulate exponents of their faith, nor
as pastors, nor
as prophets.
21: 11, 46; Luke 7: 16, 39; 13: 33; 24: 19; Cf. Matt, 12: 39) But besides «
prophet» another designation of Jesus appears in the gospels: he is
addressed as «rabbi.»
Jens wrote that when Ezekiel prophesied, «Even in the nonbeing of death the bones can hear him, because the word given the
prophet is the same word that gives being and life in the first place, that
addresses precisely [
as Saint Paul wrote] «things that are not» (1 Cor.