If it costs pennies to
address black soot and megabucks to address CO2, well, you have to start somewhere.
Not exact matches
Back in 2000, I wrote the first stories about a push by James Hansen of NASA to curb
black carbon (
soot) as a first step, while working to build the bigger effort needed to
address the tougher CO2 challenge.
I was disappointed that they did not go into specifics of monitoring procedures and how they got their numbers, but the message was clear: deforestation is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions (mostly carbon dioxide, but also methane and
black soot) and that it needs to be
addressed in the Kyoto Protocol.
All make a sort of end run around cutting carbon emissions — though the authors explicitly and rightly acknowledge that we need to do that too — by
addressing other sources of warming, namely
black carbon
soot and methane emissions.